Idoubt
- 170
- 1
As part of a problem I need to find the center of mass of a hollow hemisphere.
I did it in the following way.
I considered the lower hemisphere ( around negative z axis )
First by definition, the position vector of the center of mass is obtained as
\vec{R}= \frac{\int\vec{r}dm}{\int dm}
Now I set up the problem in spherical coordinates
http://img855.imageshack.us/img855/4741/spherev.png
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Now, \vec{r} = R\hat{r}
where \hat{r} = sin\thetacos\phi\hat{i}+sin\thetasin\phi\hat{j}+cos\theta\hat{k}
And dm = \sigmads, where ds is the area element, and \sigma is the mass per unit area.
ds = R2sin\thetad\thetad\phi
So then \vec{R}= \frac{\int\vec{r}ds}{\int ds}
i.e (2\piR2) \vec{R}=\int\intR3 (sin2\thetacos\phi\hat{i}+sin2\thetasin\phi\hat{j}+\frac{sin2\theta}{2}\hat{k})d\thetad\phi
integrating \theta from \pi/2 to \pi and \phi from 0 to 2\pi
I get \vec{R} = -\frac{\hat{k}}{2}
now I know this is not the right answer, the correct answer is -\frac{2\pi}{R}\hat{k}
I know that the problem can be simplified with symmetry and done with much more ease than what I have attempted, but I'd like to know what is wrong with the way I formulated the problem.
I did it in the following way.
I considered the lower hemisphere ( around negative z axis )
First by definition, the position vector of the center of mass is obtained as
\vec{R}= \frac{\int\vec{r}dm}{\int dm}
Now I set up the problem in spherical coordinates
http://img855.imageshack.us/img855/4741/spherev.png
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Now, \vec{r} = R\hat{r}
where \hat{r} = sin\thetacos\phi\hat{i}+sin\thetasin\phi\hat{j}+cos\theta\hat{k}
And dm = \sigmads, where ds is the area element, and \sigma is the mass per unit area.
ds = R2sin\thetad\thetad\phi
So then \vec{R}= \frac{\int\vec{r}ds}{\int ds}
i.e (2\piR2) \vec{R}=\int\intR3 (sin2\thetacos\phi\hat{i}+sin2\thetasin\phi\hat{j}+\frac{sin2\theta}{2}\hat{k})d\thetad\phi
integrating \theta from \pi/2 to \pi and \phi from 0 to 2\pi
I get \vec{R} = -\frac{\hat{k}}{2}
now I know this is not the right answer, the correct answer is -\frac{2\pi}{R}\hat{k}
I know that the problem can be simplified with symmetry and done with much more ease than what I have attempted, but I'd like to know what is wrong with the way I formulated the problem.
Last edited by a moderator: