Center of Mass of an irregularly shaped object

AI Thread Summary
To find the center of mass of an irregularly shaped object, the problem involved a uniform piece of sheet steel shaped like a "C." The solution utilized the method of treating the object as a collection of rectangles, allowing for the application of the center of mass equation m1x1 + m2x2 / m1 + m2. By calculating the center of mass for each rectangular section and treating them as particles with equal mass, the correct coordinates were determined. This approach successfully resolved the issue, confirming the results aligned with textbook answers.
tseryan
Messages
19
Reaction score
1
[SOLVED] Center of Mass of an irregularly shaped object

Homework Statement



A uniform piece of sheet steel is shaped as shown:
____
| __|
| |__
|___|

Compute the x and y coordinates of the center of mass of the piece.

The sketch above isn't very good but its a graph with an X and Y axis in increments of 10 (from 0-30) and the shape is a C with the bottom length one block longer (6 blocks total).

Homework Equations



I know of m1x1+m2x2 etc../ m1+m2 etc... but this problem doesn't seem to follow that.

The Attempt at a Solution



No idea how to do an object other than having the object and doing the line test.

Thanks for any help!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you find the center of mass of a rectangle? If so, treat this object as a collection of rectangles. (Then you can use that equation to find the center of mass of the entire object.)
 
:D That worked! Each block was a square, so I simply found the center of each and treated it like a system of six particles. I used the equation above by setting the mass of each particle to one (uniform piece of steel) and got the same answers as in the back of the textbook. I can't thank you enough Doc Al! This problem was driving me crazy!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top