Central Force Field: Meaning of Centrifugal Term

AI Thread Summary
In the context of motion within a Central-Force Field, the term 'centrifugal' refers to an effective potential energy that depends solely on the radius r. This term arises from the relative force expressed as (-grad) and is often misunderstood as a real force. Some participants in the discussion argue that 'centrifugal force' is a misnomer, as it is not a true force but rather a perceived effect in a rotating reference frame. The effective potential includes a term, + L^2/(2mr^2), which suggests an outward-directed force associated with the orbit. Overall, the discussion clarifies the conceptual understanding of centrifugal effects in inertial frames.
rob60
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In the study of motion in a Central-Force Field in radial coordinates it is defined an effective potential energy which depends only on the radius r: in particular there is a term 'centrifugal' because the relative force (-grad) has a centrifugal versus. What is the meaning of this expression since it is derived from an inertial frame?
thank you

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


 
Physics news on Phys.org
rob60 said:

Homework Statement



In the study of motion in a Central-Force Field in radial coordinates it is defined an effective potential energy which depends only on the radius r: in particular there is a term 'centrifugal' because the relative force (-grad) has a centrifugal versus. What is the meaning of this expression since it is derived from an inertial frame?
thank you

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Some key words in your post are missing or incorrect, as it makes no sense as it stands?
 
I'm sorry but I do not understand what are the errors. thanks for the help
 
rob60 said:
I'm sorry but I do not understand what are the errors. thanks for the help

What is a centrifugal versus?

And I don't think you should be using the term centrifugal anyway! The is no such thing as a centrifugal force!
 
oh yes. My english is inadequate: excuse me, please.
the 'effective potential expression' has a term: + L^2/(2mr^2).
The force associate is directed outward from the center of the orbit, it looks like a 'centrifugal force'.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top