Centrifugal/Centripetal Acceleration

  • Thread starter Thread starter thebigeis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration
AI Thread Summary
A user is trying to calculate the centripetal acceleration at the end of a test tube placed 10 cm from the axis of rotation in a centrifuge running at 4000 rpm. They initially used a radius of 5 cm, resulting in an incorrect acceleration value of 8772.98 m/s². Another participant points out that the correct radius should be 10 cm, which is the actual distance from the axis. The user needs to recalculate using the correct radius to obtain the accurate centripetal acceleration. This highlights the importance of using the correct measurements in physics calculations.
thebigeis
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
This question is actually posted up, but not under a very descriptive title so I'm reposting it and hoping the admin will just close my other one... sorry. Anyway, here is my problem-

#1) A typical lab centrifuge rotates at 4000rpm. Test tubes have to be placed into a centrifuge very carefully because of the very large accelerations. What is the acceleration at the end of a test tube that is 10cm from the axis of rotation in?

What I've already done is find the circumference of the circle, multiplied that by how many revs in a minute the lab does, divide that by 60 to get it in how many revs it does per second, then plug it into the centripetal acceleration equation a=(v^2)/r.

Work:
Known- 4000rpm, r=5cm
Find-a

4000rpm * (2pi(r=5)) = 1256.6m/min
1256.6/60 = 20.94m/s
a = ((v=20.94)^2)/(r=.05m) = 8772.98m/s^2

Obviously, this isn't right; so what do I need to do?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
thebigeis said:
Work:
Known- 4000rpm, r=5cm
Find-a

4000rpm * (2pi(r=5)) = 1256.6m/min
1256.6/60 = 20.94m/s
a = ((v=20.94)^2)/(r=.05m) = 8772.98m/s^2

Obviously, this isn't right; so what do I need to do?
Why are you using 5 cm as the radius? Should it not be 10 cm?

AM
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top