Centripetal Acceleration calculation help

AI Thread Summary
The centripetal acceleration at the tip of a 4.00 m long helicopter blade rotating at 300 rpm is calculated to be 3948.87 m/s². The linear speed of the blade tip is determined to be 125.28 m/s, which is slower than the speed of sound at 340 m/s. There is a discussion about the surprising nature of these results, with some questioning the high centripetal acceleration value. It is noted that helicopters, since their inception in the 1920s, have not operated at supersonic speeds due to the limitations of propeller design. The conversation emphasizes the difference in sound characteristics between helicopter blades and supersonic objects.
nautica
a) calculate the centipetal acc at the tip of a 4.00 m long helicopter blade that rotates at 300 rpm.

300 rpm = 31.42 rad/s = w

Centrip Acc = rw^2

Ac = (3.41 rad/s)^2 * 4 m

Ac = 3948.87 m/s^2

b)compare linear speed of the tip with the speed of sound which is 340 m/s

v=rw

v = 4m * (31.42 rad/sec) = 125.28 m/s

So the blades are slower than the speed of sound.

This does not sound right to me I figured the blades would be faster - but maybe just not at the tip?

Thanks
Nautica
 
Physics news on Phys.org
OK up to here, I think...
Originally posted by nautica
Ac = 3948.87 m/s^2
But how do you arrive at this figure? - Seems much too large to me...
v=rw
v = 4m * (31.42 rad/sec) = 125.28 m/s
So the blades are slower than the speed of sound.
This does not sound right to me I figured the blades would be faster - but maybe just not at the tip?
IMO, your math is correct here. Not sure, but I think helicopters have been around since the 1920's or so, when no aircraft engineer was even close to handling supersonic speeds... Still those machines worked, didn't they? Another thing, I believe it's not possible to move supersonic with any propeller-driven aircraft because the blades are just not allowed to move supersonic - turbulence & friction would lead to destruction... Just compare a helicopter's sound to that of a whiplash (where the tip does reach supersonic) - it's very different, much smoother isn't it? ... Enough for now.
 
Sorry, it was a typo, should have been 31.42

Thanks
Nautica
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top