Centripetal acceleration problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a bug on a rotating disk, focusing on centripetal and tangential acceleration. The teacher explained that the bug's maximum linear speed is determined by the balance of forces, where static friction provides the necessary centripetal force. The confusion arises from understanding why tangential acceleration is constant while centripetal acceleration increases; this is because centripetal acceleration depends on the bug's speed, which increases as the disk rotates. The teacher used tangential acceleration to calculate the time until the bug falls off, as it remains constant during the motion. Overall, the problem highlights the interplay between tangential and centripetal forces in rotational dynamics.
bballcool34
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
A small bug is sitting on the edge of a uniform disk of mass 2.5 kg and radius 20 cm initially at rest. There is a massless string wrapped around the disk and the coefficient of friction between the bug and the disk is u= 0.4. The string is then pulled with a constant tension of 4 N.

a) What is ther maximum linear speed the bug can have and stay on the disk?
b) How many seconds until the bug falls of the disk assuming the string is long enough to keep applying the force?

I know the solution, but I'm confused as to why my teacher did it. He said:

"Because there is a constant tangential acceleration and an increasing centripetal acceleration, so the acceleration is the resultant of those two perpendicular components.

For part a, He set potential energy equal to net force and solved for v (umg= ma). Why didn't he take into account centripetal force? Why is centripetal accel. increasing, but tangential acceleration constant?

For part b, he said v= a tangential * t. Why did he just use tangential acceleration to determine how long the bug stays on the disk?

Thanks in advance for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The bug moves together with the disk along a circle. It sits at the rim of the disk, so its acceleration has a centripetal component v2/R. The rotation of the disk is accelerated by the tension of the string. You get the angular acceleration β by dividing the torque of the tension τ=TR with the moment of inertia of the disk (I): β =TR/I, and the linear acceleration at the rim is at=βR.

As the bug moves together with the disk, its acceleration also has centripetal and tangential components. The acceleration is the resultant of these two perpendicular accelerations, and the force is parallel to the resultant acceleration.

The magnitude of the resultant acceleration is

a=√(acp2+at2)

and the magnitude of the resultant force is ma.

The force on the bug is provided by the static friction, which maximum value is μgm: μgm=ma. Your teacher took the centripetal acceleration into account as 'a' is the resultant of both accelerations, centripetal and tangential.

As for b: the velocity is always tangential, and the bug stays at place while its speed is less than the maximum value. The rim moves with uniform tangential acceleration at, so the speed is proportional to the elapsed time: v=at*t .

ehild
 
Thanks for the reply.

One thing that is still confusing to me though is how, from the problem, I can know that tangential acceleration is constant, but centripetal acceleration is increasing?
 
bballcool34 said:
One thing that is still confusing to me though is how, from the problem, I can know that tangential acceleration is constant, but centripetal acceleration is increasing?
Centripetal acceleration depends on the speed of the bug; tangential acceleration does not.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top