Centripetal force and water in a Bucket

AI Thread Summary
When a bucket is swung upside down, the water remains inside if the required centripetal force equals or exceeds the gravitational force acting on it, which is 9.81 m/s². If the centripetal acceleration is less than this, such as 5 m/s², gravity will dominate, causing the water to fall out. The confusion arises from the idea that for the water to stay in the bucket, it must be accelerated downwards faster than gravity, which seems counterintuitive. Additionally, if both the bucket and water are falling, they would remain together until reaching the ground. Understanding the balance of forces is crucial for grasping this concept.
Jimmy87
Messages
692
Reaction score
19

Homework Statement


To explain why water falls out of a bucket when it is not being swung fast enough

Homework Equations



a = mv^2/r

The Attempt at a Solution


I have had a look on previous threads and nearly get it but still a bit confused. When the bucket is upside down and the required centripetal force is 9.81m/s^2 then the water will stay in the bucket and the tension in the string will be zero and the normal force from the bottom of the bucket on the water will also be zero. If the bucket was swung where the required centripetal acceleration was 5m/s^2 then gravity would provide too much and the water would fall out of the bucket. It's the description in my book that confuses me:

"In order for the water to stay in the bucket when it is upside down the water needs to be accelerated (pulled downwards) faster than what gravity would move the water". If water is being pulled downwards faster than gravity then wouldn't it fall out the bucket even faster not stay in the bucket? Also if the required centripetal acceleration is 5m/s^2 then surely the bucket would also fall so since they are both falling wouldn't the water still stay in the bucket until it hit the ground?

Any help is much appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If water is being pulled downwards faster than gravity then wouldn't it fall out the bucket even faster not stay in the bucket?
Can't make much of what this is trying to say. Anyway, there is no other downward pulling force.

Also if the required centripetal acceleration is 5m/s^2 then surely the bucket would also fall so since they are both falling wouldn't the water still stay in the bucket until it hit the ground?
Good point. And you are correct. So you don't just get the water on your head, but the bucket as well!
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
BvU said:
Can't make much of what this is trying to say. Anyway, there is no other downward pulling force.

Good point. And you are correct. So you don't just get the water on your head, but the bucket as well!

Thanks. So if the bucket was being swung at 5m/s^2 then would the water and bucket fall at the same rate (i.e. the water would stay in the bucket the whole time until it fell on your head)?
 
At ##\omega^2 r = 5## m/s2, gravity would win at an angle of 30 degrees above horizontal. The water pours out, rope goes slack, etc. No uniform circular motion possible (which, by the way is generally the case: g pulls down both at the bottom and at the top).

Wait for reasonable weather and do the experiment! Tip: use a small bucket.
 
Jimmy87 said:

Homework Statement


To explain why water falls out of a bucket when it is not being swung fast enough


Homework Equations



a = mv^2/r

The Attempt at a Solution


I have had a look on previous threads and nearly get it but still a bit confused. When the bucket is upside down and the required centripetal force is 9.81m/s^2 then the water will stay in the bucket and the tension in the string will be zero and the normal force from the bottom of the bucket on the water will also be zero. If the bucket was swung where the required centripetal acceleration was 5m/s^2 then gravity would provide too much and the water would fall out of the bucket. It's the description in my book that confuses me:

"In order for the water to stay in the bucket when it is upside down the water needs to be accelerated (pulled downwards) faster than what gravity would move the water". If water is being pulled downwards faster than gravity then wouldn't it fall out the bucket even faster not stay in the bucket? Also if the required centripetal acceleration is 5m/s^2 then surely the bucket would also fall so since they are both falling wouldn't the water still stay in the bucket until it hit the ground?

Any help is much appreciated!
You should give us the name of the physics text you are using and the page that this explanation appears on. Incorrect solutions in texts are not uncommon but they are often minor mistakes such as calculation errors. This is a conceptual error that indicates that the author has a fundamental misunderstanding of something rather basic. I would complain to your teacher.

AM
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top