Centripetal Force Lab: Calculate Proportionality & Plot Data

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating proportionality and plotting data related to centripetal force. The user seeks guidance on rearranging frequency data to achieve a straight line when graphed. They mention a previous lab experience with period versus force, noting that frequency is the inverse of the period. A suggestion is made to plot T against 1/sqrt(force) to linearize the graph. Additionally, there is clarification on the meaning of frequency expressed as 10 s^-1, confirming it represents 10 cycles per second or 10 hertz.
F.B
Messages
81
Reaction score
0
I need help with a question on my lab, I am used to finding proportionality statements between sets of data and graphing it to get a straight line. But this question is different. Anyways here's the data i have. Oh you the lab is on Centripetal Force

frequency/Force
1.02 / 5
1.33 / 10
1.65 / 15
1.87 / 20

The slashes just separate the numbers so they don't bunch up.

Here the question i need help on.

Rearrange the data for the frequency in such a manner as you think will result in a straight line when plotted. Plot this data on graph paper#2. What is the equation for this relationship by calculating the constant of proportionality.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I just did a lab like this a few days ago, although I am sure I did a terrible job :-p

I did not do frequecy, I did period vs. force, but frequency is 1/T, so it should not be terribly different. You must first manipulate your centripetal force formula in such a wat that you have insolated your term(s) for frequency, then you will be able to work out a mathematical relationship, which for me was T is inversely proportional to the root of ceptripetal force. Rather than plotting my graph T vs. Force, I plotted it as T vs. 1/sqrt(force), which straightens your graph.
 
another quick question. If in one of the questions it says the frequency is 10 s^-1 what does that mean? does it mean??
 
10 cycles per second, or 10 hertz. Raising a unit to the negative one is a fancy way of putting it in the denominator.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
8K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top