Centripetal Force of an amusement park ride

AI Thread Summary
In an amusement park ride scenario, the centripetal force exerted by the rotating cylinder on a rider is influenced by both the cylinder's rotation and gravitational force. The calculation for the force that the ring pushes on a rider at the top of the ride involves subtracting the gravitational force from the centripetal force, leading to a net force of 230N rather than the initially calculated 620N. The discussion highlights the importance of distinguishing between the force exerted by the ring and the net force experienced by the rider, emphasizing that the question's wording can lead to confusion. Clarification on whether the question seeks the effective force or the contribution from the ring is deemed necessary. Ultimately, understanding the action-reaction principle is crucial in resolving the apparent discrepancies in the calculations.
kevin17ym
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In an amusement park ride, passengers stand inside an 8m radius cylinder. Initially, the cylinder rotates with its axis oriented along the vertical. After the cylinder has acquired sufficient speed, it tilts into a vertical plane, that is, the axis tilts into the horizontal. Suppose that, once the axis has tilted into the horizontal, the ring rotates once every 4.5 seconds. If a rider's mass is 40kg, with how much force does the ring push on her at the top of the ride?


Homework Equations


F = ma, W = mg, Centripetal Force = mvv/r


The Attempt at a Solution


Since it's asking for the force that the wall of the ride is pushing on the person, shouldn't it just be mvv/r? So the answer is about 620N? Yet the correct answer is mvv/r - mg, which is 230N.
Why is that? Why does gravity matter if the question is asking "how much force does the ring push on her at the top of the ride?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's a question of semantics - how hard the ring pushes on the person is the force felt by the person is what they are after. In general, "how hard you get pushed" refers to the net force - what you get pushed by is whatever is in the direction the net force appears to come from.
 
So, the correct answer should be mvv/r? Not the net force, since the question is asking how hard the ring pushes on her, not how hard does the person get pushed? Do you get 620N if you do mvv/r?

also, v = wr
 
That's what I mean - it's semantics: you have to be able to tell when the question is using sloppy everyday language and when it is using careful physics jargon. In this case it was sloppy everyday ... they wanted the net force.

It's very borderline though.
If the question were asked here, I'd have asked for a clarification before answering.
If I were you I'd complain: it is not clear from the wording if the question wants the effective force from the ring or if it wants the contribution to the effective force from the ring. i.e. is the question to be answered from an inertial or a non-inertial POV?

If you look at it when the person is on the other side of the ring, then they feel the ring exert a stronger force - part of the stronger force comes from gravity.

I think the writer was relying on the shift to talking about the force that the person feels would clue the reader to realizing that the persons POV was needed.
 
kevin17ym said:
So, the correct answer should be mvv/r?
No. How hard the ring pushes on the person is the same as how hard the person pushes on the ring - action and reaction are equal and opposite. Pace Simon, but I see no sloppiness here.
If the ring pushes on the person with force F, what is the sum of the vertical forces on the person? What is the person's vertical acceleration? What equation does that give you?
 
haruspex said:
No. How hard the ring pushes on the person is the same as how hard the person pushes on the ring - action and reaction are equal and opposite. Pace Simon, but I see no sloppiness here.
OH riight - I misread it.
The question asks for the force of the ring on the person - the centripital force on the person is provided by the ring and by gravity.
 
Okay thx.
 
Back
Top