Certificate program in IC design or Master's in IC design?

AI Thread Summary
A user with a background in electrical engineering and physics is seeking advice on breaking into integrated circuit (IC) design. They are considering two educational options: a certificate program in IC design from UC Berkeley Extension and a Master of Advanced Study in Integrated Circuits (MASIC) from Berkeley Online. The certificate is significantly cheaper and quicker to complete but may lack prestige and rigor, while the master's program is more expensive and time-consuming but offers a more comprehensive education and better software access. The user is uncertain if the certificate would suffice for entering the field or if the master's degree is worth the high cost, especially since they are nearing completion of a master's in semiconductor device physics. They also inquire about software access in both programs, specifically mentioning Cadence. The discussion includes a brief exchange about the tone of the request for information, highlighting the challenges of communication in online forums.
physicist1985
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone,

I have a BS in EE and a BS in physics and I am wrapping up my MSE in electrical engineering from a large university in the southwest. My MSE concentration is semiconductor devices. I don't know anything about IC design really, but I would like to somehow break into the field. I figure the best way would be to get some education in the area. I am considering either the certificate program in IC design from UC Berkeley Extension or the Master of Advanced Study in IC at Berkeley Online. The pros and cons I can see are below.

Certificate-

Pros: Much cheaper (~3700 dollars), faster completion time, (~1.5-2 years or 150 hours of instruction time plus assignments and some proctored exams)
Cons: Less prestigious and probably less rigorous. I am guessing it will use a watered down layout package but I don't know for sure.

Masters-

Pros: Much more prestigious and I will probably get a much more thorough education, probably access to better software (Cadence)
Cons: It is almost exactly 15 times the cost (55,000 dollars), will take longer most likely.

It is clear to me which one is "better" but will the certificate be adequate to break into the field or do I really need the MASIC? Is the MASIC worth 15 times the cost? Keep in mind I nearly already have a masters in a related area (semiconductors device physics) and will finish that in a couple semesters.

Also, those that might have second hand or first hand knowledge or the certificate program (and the masters), do they give access to software packages that are relevant to industry, such as cadence?

Thanks everyone in advance for your insight.

Regards,

Physicist1985
 
Physics news on Phys.org
64 views and no replies? I guess nobody has any experience with these programs?
 
My servants! Attend me!

You are asking people for a favor. You don't have a right to demand an answer, much less demand it in less than 24 hours. You might want to think about adopting a tone more in line with asking a favor.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
My servants! Attend me!

You are asking people for a favor. You don't have a right to demand an answer, much less demand it in less than 24 hours. You might want to think about adopting a tone more in line with asking a favor.

Vanadium,

I apologize if I came across as demanding. It was not my intent to demand anything. I am just curious that nobody here has heard of or has any experience with these programs, hence the comment "I guess nobody has any experience with these programs"...maybe they are not as sought after as I suspected.

That's the problem with forums. You can't really extract information about a person's "tone". I typed that in the friendliest tone possible.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top