Challenging physics problems uniform circular motion, centripetal force

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on deriving a formula that relates frequency to tension force, radius, and mass in the context of uniform circular motion. The experiment involved measuring the frequency of a system where rubber stoppers acted as mass and metal weights created tension in a string. It was established that frequency is proportional to the square root of the inverse of both the radius and mass, as well as the square root of the tension force. Participants suggested combining these relationships into a single equation using proportionality constants, leading to the final equation f = 2πk√(F/rm). This equation effectively incorporates the variables of frequency, tension force, radius, and mass.
adeel
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
challenging physics problems...uniform circular motion, centripetal force

here is the setup, we had a lab in class, in which a string was strung through a plastic tube. On on end, rubber stoppers were attached and in this case acted as a mass. On the other end, metal masses were hooked on to cause tension in the string. The apparatus was swung around and the time taken for 20 revolutions was recorded. One that was complete, we divided 20/time taken to get frequency. Throughout the experiment, the tension force (weight of metal masses), the mass (the rubber stoppers) and the radius of the string were altered. Once this has been completed, we are to create an equation incorporating frequency and its relationship to tension force, radius, and mass.

From my experiment, frequency is proportional to the square roots of 1/radius and 1/mass and is proportional to the square root of the tension force.

Also, the standard equation is tension = 4 x pi x pi (or pi squared) x mass x radius x frequency x frequency (frequency squared)

does anyone know how to derive a formula using the proportionality statements i came up with? Can anyone help me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi

According to what I understood of the problem this is how u proceed:

Let T = tension, m = mass of the cork, v = linear velocity of the cork, r = radius, f = frequency, w = ang.frequency; a=accln

then,

T - (mv2)/r = M*a
w = 2*π*f

Substitute this and find the value of T w.r.t f


Sridhar
 


First, let's define the variables:

- F = tension force
- m = mass of rubber stoppers
- r = radius of string
- f = frequency

From your experiment, we can see that frequency is proportional to the square root of 1/radius and 1/mass. This can be written as:

f ∝ √(1/r) and f ∝ √(1/m)

To combine these proportions into one equation, we can use the proportionality constant k:

f = k√(1/r)√(1/m)

Now, let's look at the relationship between frequency and tension force. We can see that frequency is also proportional to the square root of the tension force:

f ∝ √F

Again, we can use a proportionality constant k to combine these proportions into one equation:

f = k√F

Combining this equation with the previous one, we get:

f = k√(1/r)√(1/m)√F

Simplifying this equation, we get:

f = k√(F/rm)

Finally, we can substitute the standard equation for tension (F = 4π²mrƒ²) into our equation:

f = k√(4π²mrƒ²/rm)

f = k√(4𲃲)

f = 2πkƒ

Therefore, the final equation incorporating frequency, tension force, radius, and mass is:

f = 2πkƒ = 2πk√(4π²mrƒ²/rm)
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top