Challenging problem corrrection no sine and no cosine law

  • Thread starter Thread starter davedave
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cosine Law Sine
davedave
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
sorry about the mistake in my last post. I miswrote the bottom vertex of the equilateral triangle.

Let me re-state the problem correctly

This is the 3rd and final question I post from the book, The Unsolvable and the Solvable.

It is NOT a homework question. This is something for everyone to try out for interest.

Consider an isoceles triangle ABC and an equilateral triangle BCF which share the side BC as shown below. Please ignore the dotted lines.

......A


......D
.........E

....B_________________C



......F

D is a point on side AB and E is a point on side AC.

angle DAE=20 degrees
angle DEA=20 degrees
angle EDC=10 degrees
angle ECD=10 degrees
angle DBC=80 degrees
angle DCB=70 degrees
angle BDC=30 degrees

WITHOUT using the sine and cosine law, determine angle EFC.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Label the following unknown angles:

a = BDF b = FDC c = DEF d = FEC e = BFD f = DFE g = EFC

Then, write 7 different equations involving them.

For example, a + e + 140 = 180.

Once you have 7 equations with 7 unknowns, it can be solved. Though, it is messy. If you know linear algebra, I would use matrices to solve the system.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top