Change in elect. PE given work, KE, charge

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the change in electric potential energy (PE) for a charge being moved by an external force. The charge is initially at rest and has a specified amount of kinetic energy (KE) when it reaches the final point. The context is within the subject area of electric potential energy and work-energy principles.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between work done, potential energy, and kinetic energy, with some questioning the assumption that potential energy equals kinetic energy. Others explore the implications of the work-energy principle and how it applies to the problem.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of the concepts involved, with participants offering various interpretations of the relationships between work, kinetic energy, and potential energy. Some guidance has been provided regarding the use of the work-energy equation, but no consensus has been reached on the specific approach to take.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential confusion regarding the relevance of the charge's magnitude and the nature of the electric field in the problem. There is also mention of a previous misunderstanding related to the notation used in the problem statement.

kevnm67
Messages
43
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The work done by an external force to move a -8.4*10^-6C charge from point a to point b is 1.9*10^3J. If the charge was started at rest and has 4.81*10^4J of KE when it reach pt. B, what's the change in PE of the charge?


Homework Equations


Not sure
W=change in U
PE=KE


The Attempt at a Solution


I tried a few things but I am just not sure how to approach this problem. I attempted V=Uelect/q and W= change in U, U=qV... just looking for some direction, thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kevnm67 said:
Not sure
W=change in U
PE=KE
Two points of contention:
i) The work done on a system increases the total energy of the system, not just the potential energy
ii) Why must PE = KE ?? PE = KE is actually a statement demonstrating the case when there is purely conversion of energy from kinetic to potential or vice versa without any additional energy input into the system.
 
hi kevnm67! :smile:

(try using the X2 icon just above the Reply box :wink:)
kevnm67 said:
The work done by an external force to move a -8.4*10^-6C charge from point a to point b is 1.9*10^3J. If the charge was started at rest and has 4.81*10^4J of KE when it reach pt. B, what's the change in PE of the charge?

i don't think the amount of the charge, or the fact that the field is electric, has anything to do with the question :rolleyes:

you're given ∆KE and W, and you're asked for ∆PE :wink:
 
tiny-tim said:
hi kevnm67! :smile:

(try using the X2 icon just above the Reply box :wink:)


i don't think the amount of the charge, or the fact that the field is electric, has anything to do with the question :rolleyes:

you're given ∆KE and W, and you're asked for ∆PE :wink:


Thanks for the responses.

OK, so I am still not sure. Work= change in Uelect. and Uelect.= q'V?

So what exactly is going on here? You have a charge that moves in a straight line from its initial position (where KE=0) to point B where it has 4.81x104J. The question asks for change in PE. So it has more PE at point A? and looses it to KE as it moves to B? How do you determine which equations to use and why? I am confused and have not seen a question like this so I completely lost. I appreciate the help
 
hikevnm67! :smile:

I don't think it matters whether it goes in a straight line or not …

try using just W = ∆KE + ∆PE :wink:
 
tiny-tim said:
hikevnm67! :smile:

I don't think it matters whether it goes in a straight line or not …

try using just W = ∆KE + ∆PE :wink:

OK, I figured out why I started to try to come up with a nonsense explanation...Thanks Tim, your correct and this was the first thing I tried and could not figure out why I did not get the correct answer. This question is from an old exam my professor posted and my mac deleted the negative sign in front of the exponents so my answer was a little off :)

Thanks for your help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K