Change in the energy of photon due to recoil of the nucleus

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the energy change of a photon due to the recoil of a nucleus, emphasizing a non-relativistic approach due to the low energy of the photon compared to the nucleus's rest mass energy. Conservation of linear momentum and kinetic energy are applied to establish equations relating the momentum of the nucleus and photon. The calculations suggest that the energy of the photon is reduced by 2m eV, which is confirmed as correct. Alternative methods for solving the equations are discussed, including using approximations and symbolic solutions to simplify calculations. The overall consensus is that the initial work is accurate, with suggestions for improving precision in calculations.
Pushoam
Messages
961
Reaction score
53

Homework Statement


upload_2017-12-22_18-50-7.png


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



Since energy of photon is very low compared to the rest mass energy of the nucleus, I consider non – relativistic calculation.

Conservation of linear momentum gives : momentum of nucleus = momentum of photon = p...(1)

Conservation of kinetic energy gives : ## \frac { p^2 c^2}{2mc^2} + pc = 14.4keV ## ...(2)

Solving the above equation gives,

pc = 14.39999806 keV, m = 57 ## m_p ##

So, the energy of the photon gets reduced by 2m eV. Is this correct?
[/B]
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-12-22_18-50-7.png
    upload_2017-12-22_18-50-7.png
    15.9 KB · Views: 750
Physics news on Phys.org
Your work looks correct. Notice how your method of solving the equation requires keeping a large number of significant figures. There are ways to avoid this.

For example, let ##E = pc## and let ##E_0 = 14.4## kev. So your equation (2) is ##\frac{E^2}{2mc^2} +E = E_0##. Solve this quadratic equation symbolically for ##E##. Then make an approximation before plugging in numbers using the fact that ##E_0 << mc^2##.

Or, rearrange (2) to get ##E_0 - E = \frac{E^2}{2mc^2}##. Since ##E## will be close to ##E_0##, you can let ##E = E_0## on the right hand side to obtain a good approximation for ##E_0 - E##.
 
  • Like
Likes Pushoam
TSny said:
Your work looks correct. Notice how your method of solving the equation requires keeping a large number of significant figures. There are ways to avoid this.

For example, let ##E = pc## and let ##E_0 = 14.4## kev. So your equation (2) is ##\frac{E^2}{2mc^2} +E = E_0##. Solve this quadratic equation symbolically for ##E##. Then make an approximation before plugging in numbers using the fact that ##E_0 << mc^2##.

Or, rearrange (2) to get ##E_0 - E = \frac{E^2}{2mc^2}##. Since ##E## will be close to ##E_0##, you can let ##E = E_0## on the right hand side to obtain a good approximation for ##E_0 - E##.

Thanks for the insights. It's easy and clear.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top