Change of basis- contravariant, covariant components of a vector.

Newtons Balls
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let e_{i} with i=1,2 be an orthonormal basis in two-dimensional Euclidean space ie. the metric is g_{ij} = \delta _{ij}. In the this basis the vector v has contravariant components v^{i} = (1,2). Consider the new basis
e_{1}^{'} = 5e_{1} - 2e_{2}
e_{2}^{'} = 3e_{1} - e_{2}

a)Calculate the contravariant components of v in the new basis

a)Calculate the components of the metric in the new basis

a)Calculate the covariant components of v in the new basis

The Attempt at a Solution


Just a quick intro- I have no textbooks on linear algebra just the accompanying textbook to the module this question is from, unfortunately it doesn't get into much detail at all on the linear algebra side of things (this is a special relativity course).

Nevertheless, what I'm thinking is this:
I believe for part a) you just multiply the new basis transformations things by the old vector so that you end up with a new vector with components (1,1)? I've no idea what the contravariance has to do with this... I've read the definition of contravariant and covariant components and it seems to be to do with the derivatives between the two bases...

As for the metric...hmm I'm less sure about this. I know a metric defined the distance between two points in a particular space, such as in Euclidean its the kronecker delta so that it results from pythag: ds^{2}=dx^{2}+dy^{2}.... Fairly irrelevant anyway, my thinking is you express the metric as a 2x2 matrix (as its 2-d space) and then transform it using the given change of bases?
This would result in(I think):
( 5 3)
(-2 -1)

This is probably all wrong :p

And as for determining the covariantcomponents I haven't even got a clue ^_^

This is pretty much all wrong but I haven't really got any idea, all I can find in the book I have on this module is the definition of metric, contravariant and covariant components with respect to tensors.

Thanks :biggrin:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Newtons Balls said:

Homework Statement


Let e_{i} with i=1,2 be an orthonormal basis in two-dimensional Euclidean space ie. the metric is g_{ij} = \delta _{ij}. In the this basis the vector v has contravariant components v^{i} = (1,2). Consider the new basis
e_{1}^{'} = 5e_{1} - 2e_{2}
e_{2}^{'} = 3e_{1} - e_{2}

a)Calculate the contravariant components of v in the new basis

a)Calculate the components of the metric in the new basis

a)Calculate the covariant components of v in the new basis

The Attempt at a Solution


Just a quick intro- I have no textbooks on linear algebra just the accompanying textbook to the module this question is from, unfortunately it doesn't get into much detail at all on the linear algebra side of things (this is a special relativity course).

Nevertheless, what I'm thinking is this:
I believe for part a) you just multiply the new basis transformations things by the old vector so that you end up with a new vector with components (1,1)? I've no idea what the contravariance has to do with this... I've read the definition of contravariant and covariant components and it seems to be to do with the derivatives between the two bases...

As for the metric...hmm I'm less sure about this. I know a metric defined the distance between two points in a particular space, such as in Euclidean its the kronecker delta so that it results from pythag: ds^{2}=dx^{2}+dy^{2}.... Fairly irrelevant anyway, my thinking is you express the metric as a 2x2 matrix (as its 2-d space) and then transform it using the given change of bases?
This would result in(I think):
( 5 3)
(-2 -1)

This is probably all wrong :p

And as for determining the covariantcomponents I haven't even got a clue ^_^

This is pretty much all wrong but I haven't really got any idea, all I can find in the book I have on this module is the definition of metric, contravariant and covariant components with respect to tensors.

Thanks :biggrin:
First, you don't need to worry about the distinction between "contravariant" and "covariant" components. In Euclidean space, or any space in which the coordinate axes are always orthogonal, they are the same. So just think "components".

You are given that v^{i} = (1,2) ande_{1}^{'} = 5e_{1} - 2e_{2} and e_{2}^{'} = 3e_{1} - e_{2}. You need to solve a a_1'+ be_2'= e_1+ 2e_2. that is, a(5e_1- 2e_2)+ b(3e_1- e_2)= e_1+ 2e_2 Multiplying that out and setting coefficients of e_1 and e_2 equal gives you two equations for a and b.


As for the metric, you can think of it as given by ds^2= dx^2+ dy^2= de_1^2+ de_2^2. Solving the given equations for e_1 and e_2 as functions of e_1' and e_2', you get e_1= -e_1'+ 2e_2' and e_2= -3e_1'+ 5e_2'. Then de_1= -de_1'+ 2de_2' so de_1^2= de_1'^2- 4de_1'de_2'+ 4de_2'^2 and d_2= -3de_1'+ 5de_2' so de_2^2= 9de_1'^2- 30de_1'de_2'+ 25de_2'^2. Adding those, ds^2= 10de_1'^2-34de_1'de_2'+ 29de_2'^2. Since the metric tensor is always symmetric, it is
\left[\begin{array}{cc}10 & -17 \\ -17 & 29\end{array}\right].

Of course, you are close with looking at the transformation matrix. The transformation matrix, from e_i to e_i' is
\left[\begin{array}{cc}5 & -2 \\ 3 & -1\end{array}\right]
so the transformation matrix the other way is its inverse
\left[\begin{array}{cc}-1 & 2 \\ -3 & 5\end{array}\right]

Multiplying that by its adjoint gives
\left[\begin{array}{cc}-1 & -3 \\ 2 & 5\end{array}\right]\left[\begin{array}{cc}-1 & 2 \\ -3 & 5\end{array}\right]= \left[\begin{array}{cc}10 & -17 \\ -17 & 29\end{array}\right]
 
hello HallsofIvy,

a question for you. What is this covariance and contravariance?
Is it about the components of the vector (tensor) or the basis vectors of the chosen coord system?
Can you give a layman explanation?
thanks
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top