Change of Variable for Double Integral: Jacobian's Integration [SOLVED]

  • Thread starter Thread starter Suitengu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a double integral involving a change of variables and the Jacobian, specifically addressing the lack of information regarding the region of integration, denoted as R. Participants express confusion about how to proceed without a clear definition of R and the boundaries involved.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants question the absence of the region R and whether it was an oversight by the instructor. There are attempts to derive relationships between variables using suggested equations, and some participants express uncertainty about the expected approach to the problem.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing thoughts on the potential nature of the region and the equations provided. Some guidance has been offered regarding the relationships between variables, but there is no consensus on how to proceed with the integration without further clarification of the problem's context.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the absence of a visual representation of the region and express concern over the expectation to derive equations without sufficient information. There is mention of a triangular region with specific vertices, which adds to the complexity of the problem.

Suitengu
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Jacobian's Integration

Homework Statement


Find an appropriate change of variable in order to evaluate the double integral over R. (Hint:you could find the equations of the boundary lines, and then do the change of variables)

[tex]\int R \int 4(x+y)\exp{x-y} dA[/tex]

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


I don't understand how I am going to change the variable when I received no region to begin with. I am wondering if this was a mistake on the part of the teacher.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
This problem makes no sense unless you are given "R". Perhaps there was a picture to go with the problem?
 
There was no picture whatsoever and I like you was dumb-struck. I thought it was just a question which was clearly out of my league but hearing this response let's me know she must have made a mistake. *sighs* ah brotha
 
I looked through some text and I found the problem but this one has the equations
x = (1/2)(u+v) and y = (1/2)(u-v). But she said we should solve the problem as an indefinite integral so i am now lost.
 
I really would like to know what the problem really was! From x= (1/2)(u+ v) and y= (1/2)(u- v) we can get u+ v= 2x and u- v= 2y so, adding the equations, 2u= 2x+ 2y and u= x+ y. Subtracting the two equations, 2v= 2x- 2y and v= x- y. I strongly suspect that the original problem was to integrate over a diamond shaped region with boundaries given by x+ y= constant and x- y= constant.
 
yeah she showed us in class today that the problem originally stemmed with a triangular region. But she had expected us to bring some equations out of thin air like u = x+y and v = u-v and find the jacobian and do an indefinite integral.

In case of the triangular area with vertices: (-1 1) (0 0) and (1 1), how would you do a change of variable to make that look like a square or rectangular region in terms of u an v?
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K