Change of variables in double integral

yitriana
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
<br /> \int_{c_1}^{c_2} \int_{g_1 (x)}^{g_2 (x)} f(x,y) dy dx

If f(x,y) is function such that it is not easily integrable, if we wanted to switch the bounds of integration so that h1(y) = g1(x) , same for g2(x),
what would be the general way to rewrite the bounds? Would it involve inverse functions?

Let me clarify with a specific (easy) example:

<br /> \int_{0}^{4} \int_{2}^{\sqrt{y}} e^{x^3} dx dy,

rewriting sqrt(y) = x as y = x2, and finding intersection points would enable us to rewrite as,

<br /> \int_{0}^{2} \int_{0}^{x^2} e^{x^3} dy dx

and make it possible to integrate.

==

So, how would we rewrite something like

<br /> \int_{0}^{2} \int_{\sin{y}}^{(y-1)(y-2)(y-3)} e^{x^3} dx dy

in solvable terms?

Would we have to find the inverse of sin{y} and the other function as a function of x and make those the bounds for dy?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
yitriana said:
what would be the general way to rewrite the bounds? Would it involve inverse functions?
Geometry helps. Your bounds describe a two-dimensional region S in the Euclidean plane. Explicitly, S is the set of all solutions to the system of inequations:
c_1 \leq x \leq c_2
g_1(x) \leq y \leq g_2(x)
and the main theorem (Fubini) you're invoking is that if f is a sufficiently nice function, then this iterated (one-dimensional) integral is equal to the (two-dimensional) integral over the region:
\int_{c_1}^{c_2} \int_{g_1(x)}^{g_2(x)} f(x, y) \, dy \, dx = \int_S f

If you want to switch the order of integration, then you need to rearrange the above system of equations. Quite frequently, this requires splitting the region S into several subregions. For example, suppose S was given by
-1 \leq x \leq 1
2x^2 - 1 \leq y \leq x^2​
(Sketch this region on a sheet of paper)

(No seriously, go sketch it before you continue reading)

I think (hope) it's clear that you should separate S into three regions:

Region I: y \leq 0
Region II: y &gt; 0 and x \leq 0
Region III: y &gt; 0 and x &gt; 0

(These three regions cover the entire plane. This makes sure that I don't accidentally "lose" or "overcount" any points -- every point in S is guaranteed to be in exactly one of these three regions. It would have been okay to let them overlap along a line, though)

In Region I, my system of equations is
y \leq 0
-1 \leq x \leq 1
2x^2 - 1 \leq y \leq x^2​

It should be clear how to express this region as a system of inequalities that let's you write down an iterated integral with the variables reversed. You can grind it out through purely algebraic manipulation if you wanted to (including discovering the way to split it into three regions), but it's not an exercise I would recommend except as algebra practice.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top