Changing Potential Energy of a Magnetic Coil

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the change in potential energy of a magnetic coil when rotated from an antiparallel to a parallel orientation with a magnetic field. The magnetic moment of the coil is given as 1.40 Am^2 and the magnetic field strength is 0.830 T. The initial potential energy is calculated using the formula U = -uBcos(phi), resulting in a value of -1.162 J for the initial state and 1.162 J for the final state. The change in potential energy is ultimately determined to be -2.324 J, correcting earlier confusion regarding angle interpretations. The final conclusion emphasizes the importance of accurately applying trigonometric functions in potential energy calculations.
clope023
Messages
990
Reaction score
130

Homework Statement



A coil with magnetic moment 1.40 Am^2 is oriented initially with its magnetic moment antiparallel to a uniform magnetic field of magnitude 0.830 T.

What is the change in potential energy of the coil when it is rotated 180 degrees, so that its magnetic moment is parallel to the field?

Homework Equations



u = IA = magnetic moment

U = -uBcos(phi)

The Attempt at a Solution



U1 = -uBcos(180) = -1.162J
U2 = -uBcos(360) = 1.162J

deltaU = U2-U1 = 1.162J - (-1.162J) = 2.324J

just wondering if I did the problem correctly, I'm not sure I have the correct angles; any help is greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's just \Delta U = \mu B since U=-\mu B cos(\phi)=-\mu B cos(180) =-\mu B*(-1)=\mu B
 
konthelion said:
It's just \Delta U = \mu B since U=-\mu B cos(\phi)=-\mu B cos(180) =-\mu B*(-1)=\mu B

I actually tried that before and it came out incorrect.

edit: which is strange since reviewing my concepts again showed that the antiparallel (perpendicular) potential energy should have been 0 so more than likely it should have turned out like you said.

would it be possible that the trig function as changed?
 
Last edited:
it turns out I was correct (according to masteringphysics in this case the first antiparallel angle was 180 degrees) but the sign was negative, turns out it was like this:

U = Uf-Ui

= (-1.4*.830*cos(360))-(-1.4*.830*cos(180)) = -2.324J

thanks for the help anyway dude.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top