Charge Density of wire with potential difference

Nexest
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Problem:

Consider a long charged straight wire that lies fixed and a particle of charge +2e and mass 6.70E-27 kg. When the particle is at a distance 1.91 cm from the wire it has a speed 2.80E+5 m/s, going away from the wire. When it is at a new distance of 4.01 cm, its speed is 3.20E+6 m/s. What is the charge density of the wire?

Alright so this is how I approached it but didn't get it right:

The difference in kinetic energy at two given distances should be equal to the opposite difference in potential energy (\DeltaK = -\DeltaU), which when divided by the given charge of the particle should give the potential difference. Right? (\DeltaU = q*\DeltaV)

The potential difference is equal to -E*d where d is the distance between the two given points and E is the electric field of the wire given by: lambda/2*pi*epsilon*r.

With these you should be able to solve for lambda but I keep getting the answer wrong and I think its because I'm using the wrong r in the equation for the electric field. I thought r should be the distance from the wire to the farthest given point but I wasn't sure...

Can anyone help?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Without showing your work, I would guess you may be finding the potential incorrectly. It looks like you are treating E as a constant with the expression V=-E*d. Recall,

V=-\int \mbox{Edr}

where r is the perpendicular distance from the wire. Your approach to the problem appears correct.
 
Yes I think I found my problem, I can't use the simplified V = -Ed equation because E is not a uniform electric field in this case.
 
Can you please explain it in more detail ? How do you calculate the potential difference then if you can't consider it a uniforn electric field ? and what is d ?
 
*unicorn* said:
Can you please explain it in more detail ? How do you calculate the potential difference then if you can't consider it a uniforn electric field ? and what is d ?
I'm guessing you don't know calculus. chrisk explained it. You must integrate the electric field as a function of distance. The "d" means "differential". If you don't know calculus, then I don't expect you will have any idea what this means.
 
ok.. nevermind.. i got it.. thanks !
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top