Charge Distribution on Metallic Plates

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the charge distribution on four metallic plates, where plate 2 is charged and plates 1 and 4 are earthed. The key question is whether the outer surfaces of the earthed plates will have zero charge. Participants highlight the confusion caused by the earthed condition, noting that these surfaces maintain a potential of zero, similar to the Earth. To solve the problem, it is suggested to calculate the net potential from all plates and set it to zero, which will help determine the charge distribution. Understanding the implications of the earthed condition is crucial for solving the problem effectively.
surajkaul
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Four identical metallic plates, each of area A, are seprated by a
distance d as showen in the Figure. Plate 2 is given a charge Q. Plates 1 and 4 Both are earthed.

Homework Equations


  • Charge Distribution i.e. Charge on each Plate and On each Side of the Plate.
  • Will the Outer Surface(Earthed Surface) of the Plates 1 and 4 be having Zero Charge on Them.

The Attempt at a Solution


I really Could not figure out as the Earthed Plates are Confusing Me. I have done similar question where the None of the Plates are Earthed. I tried to start on the same Lines, But ended up confusing myself more. So It will be really Great if I get a good Explanation for this.

Thanks in Advance.
Cheers.
 

Attachments

  • 2236789.png
    2236789.png
    539 bytes · Views: 518
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The earthed surface has same potential as Earth - zero. Does this help?
 
aim1732 said:
The earthed surface has same potential as Earth - zero. Does this help?

I know that they at Zero Potential But don't know how to put this Fact to Good Use.
Thanks Anyway. :)
 
You calculate net potential due to all plates at that point and put it equal to zero. This should be related to charges on these plates and hence can give the distribution.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top