Charge distribution over two thin concentric spherical shells

captainjack2000
Messages
96
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


"A thin conducting spherical shell of radius a carries a charge q. Concentric with this is another spherical shell of radius b>a carrying a net charge Q. Describe how the charge is distributed between the inner and outer surfaces of the shells. What is te capacitance of the two shells?"


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Is it correct to say that there would be a charge +q on the outer surface of the inner shell. Due to induced charge there would then be a charge -q on the inner surface of the outer shell. Therefore there would be a charge +Q-q on the outer surface of the outer shell.

For the capacitance does it want the capacitance of the overall system. C=Q/V ??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Q is the net charge, when i did this question i took it to mean that Q=-q as it is induced by the +q on the inner sphere. note: to be a capacitor the two plates have to carry equal and opposite charges.

use gauss' law to get the field and then go from there in order to get the capacitance.
 
+Q-q ?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top