Charge of q Problem: Find q from Two 3.0g Spheres on 1.0m Threads

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mindscrape
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge
AI Thread Summary
Two 3.0 g spheres on 1.0-m-long threads repel each other after being charged, prompting a calculation for the charge q. The user initially miscalculated the charge, resulting in an unreasonably high value due to a calculator error involving exponentiation. After correcting the calculation, the user arrived at a charge of 7.46*10^-7 C but found it was still incorrect. The confusion stemmed from not converting the charge to nanocoulombs (nC) as required by the problem. Ultimately, the user resolved the issue by recognizing the need for the correct unit conversion.
Mindscrape
Messages
1,854
Reaction score
1
Two 3.0 g spheres on 1.0-m-long threads repel each other after being equally charged. What is the charge of q?

I don't know why I can't seem to get this right, but I am missing something somewhere. So, I figured I could find use the tension in the 1m string to find the horizontal component of the force, which would then equal the force of the repulsion between the charges. Which means that T_x = m g tan \theta. Also using trig to find the x leg yields .324m. If F = \frac{kq^2}{r^2} then q should be q = \sqrt{\frac{mgtan\theta 2x^2}{k}}, and plugging in the numbers would be q = \sqrt{\frac{.003kg*9.8\frac{m}{s^2}*tan(20)*.684^2m}{(9*10^9\frac{Nm^2}{C^2})}}. But that gives that q=6.17*10^13C, which would be ripping atoms in air apart. Anyone chatch were I went wrong?
 

Attachments

  • knight_Figure_25_60.jpg
    knight_Figure_25_60.jpg
    4.5 KB · Views: 442
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Oh whoops, I just figured out what I did wrong. Usually instead of using division on my calculator I just tpye ^-1, but I forgot to. Nevermind, I was right.
 
I worked this one out on my own and ended up with:

<br /> q = \sqrt{\frac{.003kg*9.8\frac{m}{s^2}*tan(20)*(2sin(20))^2 m}{(9*10^9\frac{Nm^2}{C^2})}}<br />

(Which, as far as I can tell, is identical to the one above.)

It gives me an answer of 7.46*10^-7... which is apparently incorrect. What am I missing here? I keep coming up with the same equation no matter how I approach the problem. This is super frustrating.
 
Er... nevermind. I finally realized it was asking for nC - not C. Big difference in numbers there. :p
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top