Charge through a coil in a magnetic field

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the charge that flows through a galvanometer when a circular coil is flipped in the Earth's magnetic field. The magnetic field has a magnitude of 59 μT and is inclined at 70º to the horizontal, affecting the magnetic flux through the coil. The initial and final magnetic flux values are derived using the angle between the coil's plane and the magnetic field, which is debated as either 160º or 30º, impacting the cosine values used in calculations. The total resistance in the circuit is calculated to be 225 Ω, leading to an estimated charge flow of approximately 24.86 μC. The participants clarify their understanding of the angles involved and confirm the correctness of the calculations, despite some initial arithmetic errors.
pc2-brazil
Messages
198
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


At a certain place, the Earth's magnetic field has a magnitude B = 59 μT and is inclined downward at an angle of 70º to the horizontal. A flat horizontal circular coil of wire with a radius of 13 cm has 950 turns and a total resistance of 85 Ω. It is connected to a galvanometer with 140 Ω resistance. The coil is flipped through a half revolution about a diameter, so it is again horizontal. How much charge flows through the galvanometer during the flip? (Hint: See Problem 11.)

Homework Equations


The "Problem 11" referred to in the question concludes that, if a circular loop is connected to a resistance R, this configuration is perpendicular to a magnetic field B, Φ(0) is the flux in the loop at time t = 0, and the magnetic field B varies in a continuous but not specified way, so that at time t the flux is represented by ΦB(t), then the net charge q(t) that has passed through resistor R in time t is:
q(t)=\frac{1}{R}[\Phi_B(0)-\Phi_B(t)]

The Attempt at a Solution


If the circular coil is horizontal, and Earth's magnetic field at that point is inclined downward at an angle of 70º to the horizontal, then angle between the plane of the coil and Earth's magnetic field is 70º. So, if we adopt the normal to the plane of the coil to be downward, then the angle θ between the normal to the plane and the magnetic field is 160º. So, in its initial position, the magnetic flux through the surface of the N loops should be:
\Phi(0)=NAB\cos{160º},
where A=\pi r^2 is the area of a loop.
Thus, \Phi(t) would be the negative of the above, since the loop is 180º from its original inclination.
Also, I think that the resistance R is 140 Ω + 85 Ω = 225 Ω.
So, the result would be:
q(t)=\frac{1}{R}[NAB\cos{160º}-(-NAB\cos{160º})] = \frac{1}{R}[2NAB\cos{160º})]
where R = 85+140 = 225 Ω, A = 13 cm, N = 950, A = π*13² cm², B = 0.000059 T.
This gives approximately 24.86 μC.
Does this reasoning seem correct?

Thank you in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
pc2-brazil said:
If the circular coil is horizontal, and Earth's magnetic field at that point is inclined downward at an angle of 70º to the horizontal, then angle between the plane of the coil and Earth's magnetic field is 70º. So, if we adopt the normal to the plane of the coil to be downward, then the angle θ between the normal to the plane and the magnetic field is 160º. So, in its initial position, the magnetic flux through the surface of the N loops should be:
\Phi(0)=NAB\cos{160º}

The question says that the magnetic field is inclined downward at an angle of 70º to the horizontal. So surely if we adopt the normal to the plane of the coil to be downward, then the angle between the normal and the magnetic field would be 30º. In other words, the normal to the coil plane is straight down, and the magnetic field is downwards, but not straight down, which is why the angle between them is less than 90º
 
That stuff about the angle should only cause the sign of the final answer to be different, which doesn't really matter anyway because we don't care which way the charge is going. The rest of your working looks good, I'm going to check through to see if I get the same (numerical) answer.

EDIT: Actually no, the angle does matter. If the angle is what I think it is (30º) then that will give a different answer to your 160º because cosine of these two angles will not give the same value. (The reason that I thought that only a sign change would result is because somehow I thought that 180-30=60, bad arithmetic on my part).
 
Last edited:
I've checked it through, and I'd say your working is good apart from I think the angle is not correct, which then affects the final answer.
 
Thank you for checking it.
About the angle, I think that it shouldn't matter, because, if I choose the normal to the coil to be downward instead of upward (which, I think, shouldn't matter), then the angle between the normal and B would be (90º - 70º) = 20º, and cos(20º) = -cos(160º) ≈ 0,94. So, I guess the way the charge goes through the galvanometer doesn't matter here.
 
Last edited:
pc2-brazil said:
Thank you for checking it.
About the angle, I think that it shouldn't matter, because, if I choose the normal to the coil to be downward instead of upward (which, I think, shouldn't matter), then the angle between the normal and B would be (90º - 70º) = 20º, and cos(20º) = -cos(160º) ≈ 0,94. So, I guess the way the charge goes through the galvanometer doesn't matter here.

Yes, you're totally right. I made another arithmetic error in thinking that 90-30=70 which is why I thought it should be 30 degrees. Sorry about that. I must have been more tired than I realized to have made two arithmetic errors that evening.
 
BruceW said:
Yes, you're totally right. I made another arithmetic error in thinking that 90-30=70 which is why I thought it should be 30 degrees. Sorry about that. I must have been more tired than I realized to have made two arithmetic errors that evening.
No problem, thank you for confirming it.
 
Back
Top