Charge-to-Mass Ratio of Electron in Circular Path

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the charge-to-mass ratio of an electron moving in a circular path within a magnetic field. The original poster presents specific values for the electron's speed, the diameter of its path, and the magnetic field strength, alongside a calculated charge-to-mass ratio that differs from the textbook value.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to reconcile their calculated charge-to-mass ratio with the textbook value, questioning the implications of relativistic effects on mass and the resulting charge-to-mass ratio. Other participants seek clarification on the original question and suggest potential misunderstandings regarding the formulations used.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring the discrepancies between the calculated and textbook values. Some guidance has been offered regarding the potential use of different formulations, but no consensus has been reached on the underlying assumptions or interpretations.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the effects of relativistic mass on the charge-to-mass ratio, with some uncertainty about the correct interpretation of the values presented and the implications of these effects.

Masafi
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
electron is deflected in a circular path

electron speed = 2.7 x 10^8 m/s
diameter = 3cm
magnetic field = 0.24T

1. work out charge to mass ratio - 7.5 x 10^10

2. the textbook value is 1.76 x 10^11 - comment on this value

The answer is given as electron traveling close to speed of light so relativistic effects increases mass.

But increasing the mass will decrease the charge to mass ratio, rather than increase it. Which is what is given by the textbook value...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the question?
 
Gear300 said:
What is the question?

The textbook value is higher, after taking into account of relatavistic effects, i.e. mass increasing.

increasing the mass should decrease the value of e/m

not increase it - which is what has happened there. Why is that?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
11K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
16K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K