Charged ions and high pressure

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of reducing aerodynamic friction and heat on aircraft traveling at high speeds, specifically through the idea of ionizing or charging the wing surfaces. Participants explore potential benefits and challenges associated with this approach, including the interaction of charged particles in the atmosphere.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes that charging the wing surfaces of an aircraft could reduce aerodynamic friction by repelling oppositely charged particles in the atmosphere.
  • Another participant questions the existence of charged particles in the atmosphere during flight, noting that oxygen and nitrogen are generally neutral.
  • A different participant explains that charged particles are rare in the atmosphere, typically only present during storms, and expresses uncertainty about the practical outcomes of charging aircraft surfaces.
  • One participant argues that if the aircraft were charged, it would interact with any charged particles in the air, potentially increasing drag rather than reducing it.
  • Another participant clarifies that the ionic charges of oxygen and nitrogen refer to their behavior in compounds, not their state in the atmosphere, where they are mostly neutral.
  • One participant suggests that creating a vacuum in front of the aircraft would be a more effective method for reducing drag, rather than attempting to charge the air.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the feasibility and effectiveness of charging aircraft surfaces to reduce drag, with no consensus reached on the existence of charged particles in the atmosphere or the potential benefits of such an approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the limitations of their knowledge regarding practical applications and the behavior of charged particles in the atmosphere, indicating a reliance on theoretical concepts without empirical evidence.

QuarkMatter
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I apologize if this is the wrong category,

Hello, this is my first time posting.
I loved physics concepts and theories when I was younger but after taking two physics classes in college I realized that I was struggling with the math and had to give up on my dream to become a theoretical physicist.

Having said that I always think about how to solve or improve things with my limited knowledge of physics (maybe applied science). After seeing documentaries on aircraft traveling at mach 3 or faster and the challenges faced by heat I started thinking.. That brings me to my question:

Can aerodynamic friction/heat be reduced by ionizing or charging the wing surface of the aircraft when traveling through the Earth’s atmosphere (Nitrogen/Oxygen)? Can any other benefits can be realized? Radar/light spectrum bending/disruption?

My thought would be to create a charged field that would ‘repel’ oppositely charged particles to reduce drag/friction that those particles cause. Maybe an ultrasonic field would do this also?
I don’t have the physics knowledge about this but I would like to learn.
Thanks,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
field that would ‘repel’ oppositely charged particles
What makes you think there would be any charged particles when the airplane is traveling through air?
 
dauto said:
What makes you think there would be any charged particles when the airplane is traveling through air?

Oxygen has an Ionic charge of 2- and Nitrogen is 3-, noble gasses do not have a charge.
 
I believe I am trying to explain refers to Coulomb's law and the interaction between charged particles. I was just wondering if anyone had any type of practical experience.
 
Oxygen and nitrogen gas (O2 and N2) are what you are more likely to find in the atmosphere, and they are neutral in charge, as they are more stable that way. There would be very little charged particles in the atmosphere (percentage-wise) except maybe in the event of a storm or something like that, because charged particles are inclined to react with other particles to become more stable.

I can't really help with what it would actually achieve though, as I have no practical experience.
 
Last edited:
well for the sake of an argument let's imagine that the air would be full with charged particles , but how does it help you ? if the plane would be charged too that means it' s bod while flying through would interact with those charged particles thus slowing the plane down , coulomb electrostatic field interaction is very strong by the way.

the way to think is how to get the stuff that is ahead of you out of the way , what you said is how to go from one way of friction to another way.
The only way this would work is if you could somehow manage to say set the plane at some + potential and have a positive air potential at the back of the plane and negative at the front.But that is merely science fiction as already said by others you cannot make Earth's atmosphere that charged.

If you could create a vacuum in front of the plane now that would be something.
 
QuarkMatter said:
Oxygen has an Ionic charge of 2- and Nitrogen is 3-, noble gasses do not have a charge.

Those are the charges that oxygen and nitrogen tend to have when they are ionically bonded in a compound. That doesn't mean that they are always ionized - all of the oxygen and nitrogen floating around in the Earth's atmosphere is neutrally charged.
 
Thank you all for the information, I appreciate the answers.

Back to the drawing board!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
986
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K