Charged Particles and Ionization

Vortexology
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm studying A Level physics. I've read that a bubble chamber only shows up particles with a charge, as they ionize the hydrogen in the chamber, leaving tracks, whereas neutral particles don't show up. Is it therefore true then that only charged particles ionize? Because UV-radiation is ionizing and photons don't have a charge.

Is it that charged particles are the only ones to ionize in the circumstances, i.e. in hydrogen?

Hope this makes sense.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Photons can ionize atoms, but they are destroyed in the process (or lose a significant fraction of their energy) - they do not leave tracks in the bubble chamber. The electrons which were hit by the photons can leave those tracks, however.
 
mfb said:
Photons can ionize atoms, but they are destroyed in the process (or lose a significant fraction of their energy) - they do not leave tracks in the bubble chamber. The electrons which were hit by the photons can leave those tracks, however.

So say if a charged particle decays and one of the products is neutral, which then goes on to decay into two oppositely charged particles, then the distance where the track disappears - I.e where the neutral particle was - is caused by the time it takes for that particle to be destroyed? Sorry I'm still a bit confused about this.
 
Vortexology said:
So say if a charged particle decays and one of the products is neutral, which then goes on to decay into two oppositely charged particles, then the distance where the track disappears - I.e where the neutral particle was - is caused by the time it takes for that particle to be destroyed?
Right, the distance between the two points of decays correspond to the flight distance of the neutral particle.
 
Neutral particles can ionize, but they do so only on rare close collisions. For example a photon ionizes on each Compton scattering event, giving a large amount of energy to a single charged electron, but then passes a long distance without any interaction save slight retardation and refraction. A neutron ionizes when it bounces off a proton - but these are rare events, and most of them give a lot of energy to the proton. Small energy collisions are possible, but these are especially rare - they only happen on a rare glancing collisions.

Whereas a charged particle has a long range electric field. It generates a few high energy collisions on direct hits to charge centres, but a lot of low energy ionization events at large distances. It is these low energy ionizations that form a track.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
1K
Back
Top