Charged particles arranged in tetrahedron

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving four charged particles arranged in a tetrahedron, with a focus on the aftermath of one thread snapping. The participants explore the conservation of energy to determine the maximum speed of particle A after the snap, concluding that this occurs when particles A and B are at their furthest point from each other, minimizing potential energy. They debate whether all particles will have the same speed at this moment, ultimately agreeing that while they may not have the same speed at all times, they will be equal when the configuration is planar. Tension in the strings and the potential for string CD to go slack are also significant points of contention, leading to complex calculations and corrections among the participants. The conversation highlights the intricacies of motion and forces in a system of charged particles.
utkarshakash
Gold Member
Messages
852
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement


Four charged particles (A, B, C, D), of mass m and charge q each, are connected by light silk threads of length d forming a tetrahedron floating in outer space. The thread connecting particles A and B suddenly snaps. Find the maximum speed of particle A after that.

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm trying to use conservation of energy. The initial potential energy of the system will be
\dfrac{6q^2}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 d}

But I can't realize when will the speed of particle A be maximum. Also, what will be the speed of other particles at that instant? Will they be equal.
 

Attachments

  • image020.gif
    image020.gif
    2.2 KB · Views: 535
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
utkarshakash said:
. The initial potential energy of the system will be
\dfrac{4q^2}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 d}

I think that's not correct.
 
projjal said:
I think that's not correct.

Sorry. My bad. Replace 4 with 6.
 
The maximum speed (and maximum kinetic energy) is achieved when the particle A and B swing the furthermost from each other (minimizing potential energy).
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
dauto said:
The maximum speed (and maximum kinetic energy) is achieved when the particle A and B swing the furthermost from each other (minimizing potential energy).

Would the final arrangement of particles be like this (see attached image) ?
 

Attachments

  • pf_tHdron.gif
    pf_tHdron.gif
    1.9 KB · Views: 717
utkarshakash said:
Would the final arrangement of particles be like this (see attached image) ?

Looks right to me, so what is the final potential energy? (Notice that you look for change in potential energy, you don't have to write down the complete expression for final potential energy)
 
utkarshakash said:
Would the final arrangement of particles be like this (see attached image) ?

Yes, except that the triangles ought to be equilateral.
 
dauto said:
Yes, except that the triangles ought to be equilateral.

This means one of the strings wouldn't be taut then, right?
 
utkarshakash said:
This means one of the strings wouldn't be taut then, right?

Yes, the one which snapped .
 
  • #10
SammyS said:
Yes, the one which snapped .

No. I'm talking about the strings except the one which snapped. According to dauto the triangles won't be equilateral. What, then, will be the length of sides of the triangle so formed?
 
  • #11
utkarshakash said:
According to dauto the triangles won't be equilateral.

In post #7 dauto said the triangles will be equilateral.
 
  • #12
utkarshakash said:
No. I'm talking about the strings except the one which snapped. According to dauto the triangles won't be equilateral. What, then, will be the length of sides of the triangle so formed?

No dauto said that the triangles should be equilateral. They did not look like that in your picture.

ehild
 
  • #13
ehild said:
No dauto said that the triangles should be equilateral. They did not look like that in your picture.

ehild

Looks like I misunderstood his post. :redface:

I got the correct answer.
 
  • #14
utkarshakash said:
I got the correct answer.
Nice. Good work!
 
  • #15
May be I ought not use the word ought...
 
  • #16
dauto said:
May be I ought not use the word ought...

:smile:
------------

By the way, utkarshakash. Did you find that all 4 of the particles have the same speed when particle A has maximum speed?
 
  • #17
TSny said:
:smile:
------------

By the way, utkarshakash. Did you find that all 4 of the particles have the same speed when particle A has maximum speed?

Yes. But I still have doubt why they would all have the same speed.
 
  • #18
utkarshakash said:
Yes. But I still have doubt why they would all have the same speed.

Can you describe the motion of the center of mass of the system after the string is cut?
 
  • #19
TSny said:
Can you describe the motion of the center of mass of the system after the string is cut?

Initially the center of mass is at rest. The net external force on the system is zero as tension forces are internal to it. Thus, the COM will remain at rest even after the string is cut and so, the particles will have same speed in opposite directions. Is this explanation correct?
 
  • #20
Yes, the COM must remain at rest. The 4 particles will not have the same speed at arbitrary times, but you should be able to argue that they have the same speed at the instant of time when all 4 particles lie in the same plane.
 
  • #21
TSny said:
Yes, the COM must remain at rest. The 4 particles will not have the same speed at arbitrary times, but you should be able to argue that they have the same speed at the instant of time when all 4 particles lie in the same plane.

Isn't it possible that A and B move with same speed and C and D move with same speed(but different from A and B) ? The COM in this case remains at rest .
 
  • #22
Vibhor said:
Isn't it possible that A and B move with same speed and C and D move with same speed(but different from A and B) ? The COM in this case remains at rest .

Yes, but when the maximum extension of the swing is reached and the particle configuration is planar The speeds of A and B must be equal and opposite to the speeds of C and D because all the speeds will be collinear and perpendicular to the plane containing the particles.
 
  • #23
utkarshakash said:
This means one of the strings wouldn't be taut then, right?
According to my calculations, string CD will go slack. That makes the problem a whole lot more complicated. If I'm right, the book answer is wrong.
 
  • #24
haruspex said:
According to my calculations, string CD will go slack. That makes the problem a whole lot more complicated. If I'm right, the book answer is wrong.

That's interesting. I didn't even think to check if CD would go slack!

Right now, when I do the calculations I'm getting that CD doesn't go slack. But my attempt at the calculation is messy and tedious. Every time I recheck it, I find mistakes. Just a factor of 2 somewhere can make all the difference. So, I'm not confident. But at this point I'm getting tension in CD all the way through the motion.
 
  • #25
TSny said:
That's interesting. I didn't even think to check if CD would go slack!

Right now, when I do the calculations I'm getting that CD doesn't go slack. But my attempt at the calculation is messy and tedious. Every time I recheck it, I find mistakes. Just a factor of 2 somewhere can make all the difference. So, I'm not confident. But at this point I'm getting tension in CD all the way through the motion.
OK, here are my calcs.
Let ##K=\dfrac{q^2}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 d^2}##.
Initial PE = 6Kd. Assume CD stays taut. When planar, PE = 5Kd+Kd/√3, so PE loss = Kd(1-1/√3).
If each particle now has speed v, KE = 2mv2.
Here's a tricky bit: the instantaneous axis of rotation of the triangle ACD is the line joining the midpoints of AC, AD. So the radius of rotation of A is d(√3)/4. the centripetal force = ##\frac{mv^2}{d\frac{\sqrt 3}{4}} = 2K\frac{\sqrt 3 - 1}{3} ##
Let the tension in AC be T. The electrostatic repulsion A feels from B, C and D in the BA direction is K(√3+1/√3).
Hence T√3 = K(√3+1/√3)+mv2/(d(√3)/4) = ##K\left(\sqrt 3+\frac {1}{\sqrt 3}+\frac{2\sqrt 3 - 2}{3}\right) = 2K(\sqrt 3 - \frac 13)##
The tensions in CA, CB etc. also act to pull C and D together. The force that way on C due to strings AC and BC = T = 2K(1-1/√3).
The electrostatic force acting oppositely on C is K(1+1/2+1/2) = 2K. There is no centripetal force required of CD.
√3 - 1/3 > 1, yes?

Edit: I think I've underestimated the centripetal acceleration of A by a factor of 2. The triangle ACD as a whole is accelerating towards the line where CD is at that instant. This will serve to make CD go slack even more surely.
 
Last edited:
  • #26
haruspex said:
Here's a tricky bit: the instantaneous axis of rotation of the triangle ACD is the line joining the midpoints of AC, AD. So the radius of rotation of A is d(√3)/4.

As you noted in your edit, the radius of rotation is half this amount: d(√3)/8.

Particle A moves on an ellipse with semi-major axis a = d(√3)/2 and semi-minor axis b = d(√3)/4. The radius of curvature of the ellipse at the point of interest is b2/a = d(√3)/8.

Let the tension in AC be T. The electrostatic repulsion A feels from B, C and D in the BA direction is K(√3+1/√3).

I get that the net electrostatic repulsion on A is K(√3+1/3)

I then get that √3TAC = K(7/√3 -1), or TAC = K(7/3-1/√3).

I agree with the rest of your calculation, but I'm finding that making the correction for TAC yields a tension TCD = K(√3 -1)/3.
 
Last edited:
  • #27
TSny said:
As you noted in your edit, the radius of rotation is half this amount: d(√3)/8.

Particle A moves on an ellipse with semi-major axis a = d(√3)/2 and semi-minor axis b = d(√3)/4. The radius of curvature of the ellipse at the point of interest is b2/a = d(√3)/8.



I get that the net electrostatic repulsion on A is K(√3+1/3)

I then get that √3TAC = K(7/√3 -1), or TAC = K(7/3-1/√3).

I agree with the rest of your calculation, but I'm finding that making the correction for TAC yields a tension TCD = K(√3 -1)/3.
I agree with all that. But my key error was right near the end, where I used the formula for T√3 instead of that for T :redface:.

Thanks!
 
  • #28
Now the question is if qA = qB, and qC = qD, but qC = σqA, what must σ be in order for the central string to go slack.
 
Back
Top