Charged Scalar Field Lagrangian Problem: Hawking, Ellis

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nikos
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lagrangian
Nikos
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Hi,there! Here is the lagrangian for a charged scalar field http://www.photodump.com/direct/Bbking22/P-meson-Lagrangian.jpg as it can be found in “the large scale structure of space-time” Hawking, Ellis on page 68. It seem’s that I have problem varying Aa on the lagrangian because I get http://www.photodump.com/direct/Bbking22/P-meson-Myresult.jpg , while the result of the book is http://www.photodump.com/direct/Bbking22/P-meson-AmVar.jpg . Does anyone have the same problem? Does anyone gets the book’s result? Thanks for the help. Here are all the results for this example http://www.photodump.com/direct/Bbking22/Example3.jpg .
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I seem to get the same result as you. Below are my calculations, which I have done in flat so that I could use familiar notation. I haven't checked my calculations very closely, so I could easily have made a mistake.

Have you looked in a quantum field theory book? Almost all books should include a flat space version of this. I don't have any physics books with me right now, so I can't check.

Regards,
George

<br /> L=-\frac{1}{2}\left( \partial_{a}\psi+ieA_{a}\psi\right) g^{ab}\left(<br /> \partial_{b}\overline{\psi}-ieA_{b}\overline{\psi}\right) -\frac{1}{2}<br /> \frac{m^{2}}{\hbar^{2}}\psi\overline{\psi}-\frac{1}{16\pi}F_{ab}F_{cd}<br /> g^{ac}g^{bd}<br />

<br /> \begin{align*}<br /> \frac{\partial L}{\partial A_{f}} &amp; =-\frac{1}{2}ie\delta_{a}^{f}\psi<br /> g^{ab}\left( \partial_{b}\overline{\psi}-ieA_{b}\overline{\psi}\right)<br /> +\frac{1}{2}\left( \partial_{a}\psi+ieA_{a}\psi\right) g^{ab}ie\delta<br /> _{b}^{f}\overline{\psi}\\<br /> &amp; =-\frac{1}{2}ie\psi g^{fb}\left( \partial_{b}\overline{\psi}-ieA_{b}<br /> \overline{\psi}\right) +\frac{1}{2}\left( \partial_{a}\psi+ieA_{a}<br /> \psi\right) g^{af}ie\overline{\psi}<br /> \end{align*}<br />

<br /> \begin{align*}<br /> \frac{\partial L}{\partial\left( \partial_{n}A_{f}\right) } &amp; =-\frac<br /> {1}{16\pi}\left[ \frac{\partial F_{ab}}{\partial\left( \partial_{n}<br /> A_{f}\right) }F_{cd}+F_{ab}\frac{\partial F_{cd}}{\partial\left(<br /> \partial_{n}A_{f}\right) }\right] g^{ac}g^{bd}\\<br /> &amp; =-\frac{1}{16\pi}\left[ \frac{\partial}{\partial\left( \partial_{n}<br /> A_{f}\right) }\left( \partial_{a}A_{b}-\partial_{b}A_{a}\right)<br /> F_{cd}+F_{ab}\frac{\partial}{\partial\left( \partial_{n}A_{f}\right)<br /> }\left( \partial_{c}A_{d}-\partial_{d}A_{c}\right) \right] g^{ac}g^{bd}\\<br /> &amp; =-\frac{1}{16\pi}\left[ \left( \delta_{a}^{n}\delta_{b}^{f}-\delta_{b}<br /> ^{n}\delta_{a}^{f}\right) F_{cd}+F_{ab}\left( \delta_{c}^{n}\delta_{d}<br /> ^{f}-\delta_{d}^{n}\delta_{c}^{f}\right) \right] g^{ac}g^{bd}\\<br /> &amp; =-\frac{1}{16\pi}\left[ \left( g^{nc}g^{fd}-g^{fc}g^{nd}\right)<br /> F_{cd}+F_{ab}\left( g^{an}g^{bf}-g^{af}g^{bn}\right) \right] \\<br /> &amp; =-\frac{1}{16\pi}\left[ F^{nf}-F^{fn}+F^{nf}-F^{fn}\right] \\<br /> &amp; =-\frac{1}{4\pi}F^{nf}<br /> \end{align*}<br />

<br /> \begin{align*}<br /> 0 &amp; =\frac{\partial L}{\partial A_{f}}-\partial_{n}\frac{\partial L}{\partial\left(<br /> \partial_{n}A_{f}\right) }\\<br /> &amp; =-\frac{1}{2}ie\psi\left( \partial^{f}\overline{\psi}-ieA^{f}\overline<br /> {\psi}\right) +\frac{1}{2}\left( \partial^{f}\psi+ieA^{f}\psi\right)<br /> ie\overline{\psi}+\frac{1}{4\pi}\partial_{n}F^{nf}<br /> \end{align*}<br />
 
Thank you very much George!
 
There's no 1/2 in the lagrangian in the first place. For SED in flat spacetime one has the action

S^{SED}\left[A_{\mu},\phi,\phi^{*}\right]= \int \ d^{4}x \ \left[\left(D^{\mu}\phi\right)\left(D_{\mu}\phi\right)^{*} -\frac{1}{4} F^{\mu\nu}F_{\mu\nu}-\mu^{2}\phi\phi^{*}\right]

Daniel.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top