Charged Teflon Rod & Aluminum (Conductor vs Insulator type question)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the interaction between a negatively charged Teflon rod and an initially neutral aluminum rod after contact. The Teflon rod retains a net negative charge due to its insulating properties, while the aluminum rod becomes negatively charged after receiving some electrons. When the Teflon rod is brought near the aluminum rod without touching, they attract each other because the electrons in the aluminum redistribute, creating a positive charge at the end closest to the Teflon. This attraction occurs despite both rods being negatively charged overall. The reasoning is confirmed as correct, highlighting the behavior of charges in conductive and insulating materials.
SMA777
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Hello,
Just wanted to check my some of my reasoning to these. If anyone could confirm if these answer I got are right (or point me in the right direction if they aren't!) I'd really appreciate that. Thanks!

1. Homework Statement
(No Relevant Equations, real, & Attempts at Solutions are Italicized)


Suppose a student rubbed a Teflon rod with wool then briefly touched it to an initially neutral aluminum rod suspended by insulating threads.

What would the net charge on the Teflon rod be?
I said the net charge on it would be NEGATIVE because it becomes negatively charged due to being rubbed with the wool, and while some of the electrons escape when touched to the aluminum, not all of them do because teflon is an insulator so within the teflon rod itself, they couldn't move closer to the aluminum point-of-contact to escape

What would the net charge on the aluminum rod be?
I said the net charge on the aluminum rod would also be NEGATIVE because it received some electrons from the point of contact with the Teflon rod

The student then holds the Teflon rod near the aluminum rod, but does not allow them to touch. The student observes that when the rods are close enough together, they attract. Explain why the rods are attracting each other.

I said they are attracting because the point of contact on the Teflon now doesn't have electrons because they were able to leave and transfer to the aluminum (making that point positively charged). So now, when that rod's point of contact is brought near the negatively charged aluminum, they attract each other, despite both rods having overall negative charges

...any faulty reasoning, or does this look good? Thanks for any feedback!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
SMA777 said:
Hello,
Just wanted to check my some of my reasoning to these. If anyone could confirm if these answer I got are right (or point me in the right direction if they aren't!) I'd really appreciate that. Thanks!

1. Homework Statement
(No Relevant Equations, real, & Attempts at Solutions are Italicized)


Suppose a student rubbed a Teflon rod with wool then briefly touched it to an initially neutral aluminum rod suspended by insulating threads.

What would the net charge on the Teflon rod be?
I said the net charge on it would be NEGATIVE because it becomes negatively charged due to being rubbed with the wool, and while some of the electrons escape when touched to the aluminum, not all of them do because teflon is an insulator so within the teflon rod itself, they couldn't move closer to the aluminum point-of-contact to escape

What would the net charge on the aluminum rod be?
I said the net charge on the aluminum rod would also be NEGATIVE because it received some electrons from the point of contact with the Teflon rod
Hello SMA777. Welcome to PF !

It's good down to here.

The student then holds the Teflon rod near the aluminum rod, but does not allow them to touch. The student observes that when the rods are close enough together, they attract. Explain why the rods are attracting each other.

I said they are attracting because the point of contact on the Teflon now doesn't have electrons because they were able to leave and transfer to the aluminum (making that point positively charged). So now, when that rod's point of contact is brought near the negatively charged aluminum, they attract each other, despite both rods having overall negative charges

...any faulty reasoning, or does this look good? Thanks for any feedback!
The Teflon won't become positively charged, even at the point of contact.

What will be the behavior of the charges on the aluminum rod as the Teflon rod gets very close?
 
SMA777 said:
The student then holds the Teflon rod near the aluminum rod, but does not allow them to touch. The student observes that when the rods are close enough together, they attract. Explain why the rods are attracting each other.

I said they are attracting because the point of contact on the Teflon now doesn't have electrons because they were able to leave and transfer to the aluminum (making that point positively charged). So now, when that rod's point of contact is brought near the negatively charged aluminum, they attract each other, despite both rods having overall negative charges

...any faulty reasoning, or does this look good? Thanks for any feedback!

You are right, the rods will attract each other. Think: Would they attract if the Teflon rod had not touched the aluminium before?

You know that aluminium is a metal, it has mobile free electrons. What happens with these electrons when the aluminium rod is close to a negatively charged object?

ehild
 
Oh! Got it, so, I believe this is now correct:

the electrons in the aluminum rod consolidate near the end away from the teflon rod, which they can do so because aluminum is a conductor (and they want to because both the aluminum and teflon are negatively charged, thus repelling each other). This leaves the positive charge in the aluminum rod near the end close to the teflon, causing an attraction of that positive end of the aluminum rod to the negatively charged teflon rod.

Thank you both so much for your help!
 
That is correct now! ehild
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top