Charges in a polygon distribution

mathnerd15
Messages
109
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


13 equal charges q are placed at the corners of a polygon and as on a clockface, what is the net force on a test charge at the center Q? I assume the charge at the center is positive and the charge on the polygon so they repel

Homework Equations


(1/4piEo)(qQ/r^2)

The Attempt at a Solution


it seems there is a net force in one direction where there is a lack of symmetry in the Fx, Fy. for the situation of q=3 I calculated that there is a net charge upwared of
(1/4piEo)(qQ/r^2)(1-2sin(pi/6))=0
with the equilateral triangle pointing upward, sin 30 degrees=1/2

but as n sides of the polygon approaches infinity even in an odd polygon this would resemble a smooth circle and the charges would cancel out with Fnet=0? take out one charge in the 13 sided polygon and the charge motion and electrical force is in the direction of the missing charge?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
mathnerd15 said:

Homework Statement


13 equal charges q are placed at the corners of a polygon and as on a clockface, what is the net force on a test charge at the center Q? I assume the charge at the center is positive and the charge on the polygon so they repel

Homework Equations


(1/4piEo)(qQ/r^2)

The Attempt at a Solution


it seems there is a net force in one direction where there is a lack of symmetry in the Fx, Fy. for the situation of q=3 I calculated that there is a net charge upwared of
(1/4piEo)(qQ/r^2)(1+r)
with the equilateral triangle pointing upward, sin 30 degrees=1/2

but as n sides of the polygon approaches infinity even in an odd polygon this would resemble a smooth circle and the charges would cancel out with Fnet=0? take out one charge in the 13 sided polygon and the charge motion and electrical force is in the direction of the missing charge?

You don't need all of that calculation. All you'd need is that the force towards the centre is the same for each of the charges situated on the polygon corners. You might as well call it 1. The the problem is reduced to resolved components of these equal forces, an almost pure geometrical or trigonometrical problem.

We know what you mean by not symmetrical but it is not true there is no symmetry.

Try it for 3 charges (disposed at 120° tp each other, say one at the bottom) and look at the horizontal sum of forces - easy - and then look at the vertical sum - not difficult. Then see if concolsions generalise.

mathnerd15 said:
with the equilateral triangle pointing upward, sin 30 degrees=1/2
Yes.
 
so for a circle with n=3, with the point at the bottom, Ey=(1-2sin(pi/6))=0 and Ex=0 since we rotated one point directly in -y direction
 
Last edited:
mathnerd15 said:
so for a circle with n=3, with the point at the bottom, Ey=(1-2sin(pi/6))=0 and Ex=0 since we rotated one point directly in -y direction

OK and what is sin(π/6) ?
 
sin pi/6=sin 30degrees=1/2 so the y components go to zero...I'm not sure it's exactly 30 degrees when you divide the angle?
 
Last edited:
Thought they might. It only remains to generalise.

And maybe you don't need to make a big meal of that either - maybe even the above is too complicated.

How about if what you did at the bottom node for the horizontal net force you did for each node in turn?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top