Charts on Topological Manifolds - Simple Notational Issue

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading "An Introduction to Differential Topology" by Dennis Barden and Charles Thomas ...

I am focussed on Chapter 1: Differential Manifolds and Differentiable Maps ...

I need some help and clarification on an apparently simple notational issue regarding the definition of a chart (Definition 1.1.3) ...

Definition 1.1.3 reads as follows:
?temp_hash=df27f89f2e21dffb8b683d0466b294ab.png
My question regarding this definition is as follows:

What is the meaning of M and how does it differ from M^m?

Surely the relationship between M and M^m is not the same as the relationship between R and R^m ... ?

I am not even sure what M is ... ?

Can someone clarify the above issue for me ...?

Hope someone can help ...

Peter===========================================================

So that readers can understand the context and notation of Barden and Thomas, I am providing the pages of the text leading up to and including the definition referred to above ... ... as follows ... ...
?temp_hash=df27f89f2e21dffb8b683d0466b294ab.png

?temp_hash=df27f89f2e21dffb8b683d0466b294ab.png

?temp_hash=df27f89f2e21dffb8b683d0466b294ab.png
 

Attachments

  • Barden & Thomas - Definition 1.1.3 - Chart ... .png
    Barden & Thomas - Definition 1.1.3 - Chart ... .png
    17.8 KB · Views: 832
  • Barden & Thomas - 1 - Ch 1 - page 1.png
    Barden & Thomas - 1 - Ch 1 - page 1.png
    36.3 KB · Views: 794
  • Barden & Thomas - 2 - Ch 1 - page 2     .png
    Barden & Thomas - 2 - Ch 1 - page 2 .png
    40.5 KB · Views: 796
  • Barden & Thomas - 3 - Ch 1 - page 3     .png
    Barden & Thomas - 3 - Ch 1 - page 3 .png
    47 KB · Views: 629
Physics news on Phys.org
##M^m## is just a reminder that the manifold ##M## is of ##m## dimensions. So ##M^m = M##.
I have never seen such a notation but it's clear from definition 1.1.1. It only symbolizes that the (Euclidean) coordinates are in ##ℝ^m##, i.e. there are ##m## coordinates. I guess the author drops the ##m## in ##M^m## and sticks with ##M## when he doesn't need to emphasize the dimension.
 
  • Like
Likes Math Amateur
Thanks fresh_42 ... appreciate the help ...

Peter
 
A sphere as topological manifold can be defined by gluing together the boundary of two disk. Basically one starts assigning each disk the subspace topology from ##\mathbb R^2## and then taking the quotient topology obtained by gluing their boundaries. Starting from the above definition of 2-sphere as topological manifold, shows that it is homeomorphic to the "embedded" sphere understood as subset of ##\mathbb R^3## in the subspace topology.
Back
Top