Check for me this solution in General Physic

  • Thread starter Thread starter vuvan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    General Physic
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the application of conservation of linear momentum, specifically in scenarios where the net force is zero. It highlights that gravity, represented by the force mg, is still present but may not be relevant immediately after an explosion. Participants clarify that momentum conservation can be applied in such cases, focusing on the center of mass rather than the gravitational force. There is also a mention of a potential lack of clarity in the original problem statement, which may have led to confusion. Overall, the conversation emphasizes understanding the conditions under which momentum conservation applies.
vuvan
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I reckon that we only apply conservation of linear momentum for object which has total net force acting on equal zero but in this case , the gravity force still exist , total net force is mg
Thank in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
vuvan said:
I reckon that we only apply conservation of linear momentum for object which has total net force acting on equal zero but in this case , the gravity force still exist , total net force is mg
Thank in advance

Is there a missing illustration? Because you haven't presented a problem.
 
I was not upset; I was only pointing out why you were not getting replies.

vuvan said:
I reckon that we only apply conservation of linear momentum for object which has total net force acting on equal zero but in this case , the gravity force still exist , total net force is mg
Thank in advance

I think I understand your concern. The question seems to me to be written to avoid the force of gravity by stating "right after the explosion." The focus is on momentum. Gravity only enters into what you posted in the Exercise, even then it's a path that's straight up and down and only asks about "the center of mass."
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top