Calculating Tangent for Accelerated Motion: Rise/Run?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Turvey
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the tangent for a position vs. time graph representing accelerated motion. The correct formula for determining the slope of a tangent line is indeed rise/run, but this applies only to straight lines. In cases of constant acceleration, the graph is not linear, and the slope of the tangent line varies, necessitating the use of calculus to find the derivative. While it's valid to use any two points on the tangent line to calculate its slope, the initial point must be accurately represented on the x-axis. Understanding these nuances is crucial for correctly interpreting motion graphs.
Turvey
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Just making sure that the proper forumla to calculate a tangent on a graph, (Position vs. Time) that shows an accelerated motion is rise/run.

And also, I would like to make sure that if it asks you to start at the point 0.15s, that as long as you draw the line to cross a point without going through the line, you can virtually pick any point on the x and y-axis to produce the correct answer, as long as the line touches the starting point on the x axis.

Thanks for reading, and any response is greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Turvey said:
Just making sure that the proper forumla to calculate a tangent on a graph, (Position vs. Time) that shows an accelerated motion is rise/run.

And also, I would like to make sure that if it asks you to start at the point 0.15s, that as long as you draw the line to cross a point without going through the line, you can virtually pick any point on the x and y-axis to produce the correct answer, as long as the line touches the starting point on the x axis.

Thanks for reading, and any response is greatly appreciated.

This not at all clear. You talk about "graphs" but you seem to be thinking specifically about motion. If you have a "distance versus time" graph, with constant acceleration, then the graph is NOT a straight line, the slope of the tangent line at any point varies with the point, and the slope is not "rise over run" since neither is those is defined at a single point. The slope of the tangent line can be calculated by taking the derivative.

It is true that for a straight line, you can use whatever (x,y) points you want (on the line of course) to calculate the slope- that's true since the slope of a straight line IS a single number and is independent of the points you use to calculate (y1- y0)/(x1-x0). SO if you (accurately) draw the tangent line (that may be what you meant by "draw the line to cross a point without going through the line") then you can use any two points on that tangent line to find the slope of the tangent line.

(Though I might point out that the "tangent line" to y= x3 at x= 0 does "go through" the graph!)
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top