Chemical equilibrium: Enthelpies and equilibrium contsants

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the equilibrium constants and enthalpy change (∆H) for the reaction 2 CO2 = 2 CO + O2 at varying temperatures. The user successfully calculated the equilibrium constants (K) at 1500 K, 2500 K, and 3000 K, but encountered issues when plotting lnK against 1/T, resulting in an incorrect slope and ∆H value. A second approach using bond enthalpies yielded a more accurate ∆H of 557 kJ, closer to the expected 510 kJ. The user is confused about the large slope obtained in the graph and seeks clarification on how to accurately derive ∆H from the first method. The response suggests a potential error in unit conversion between joules and kilojoules.
Coastal
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


For the system 2 CO2 = 2 CO + O2, ∆H= 510 kJ
the percentage decomposition of CO2 changes w/ temperature as follows.
Temp, K...% Decomposition
1500...0.048
2500...17.6
3000...54.8
Calculate the equilibrium constants, plot lnK vs. 1/T. In the graph, find the slope and confirm ∆H. Also, using average bond enthalpies, calculate ∆H(it should come out the same for both approaches).

Homework Equations


1.) Slope = ∆H / R
2.) R(constant) = 8.314 J/k-mol
3.) ∆Hrxn = Sum of bond enthalpies of broken bonds - Sum of bond enthalpies of formed bonds

The Attempt at a Solution


I started by calculating K at each temperature. We also did this part in class so I know all the K's are correct.
K at 1500=5.5 x 10-9
K at 2500=4.01 x 10-1
K at 3000=4.03 x 10

I plugged all these #s into the calculator to figure out lnK and 1/T. I plotted them on a graph and got a straight line with a negative slope. This threw me because lnK vs. 1/T should not be straight because this isn't a first order reaction. The slope was something like -40,000, which would then be multiplied by the constant R and ∆H came out to be -330,000(wrong).

Then I tried the 2nd approach. Using equation #3 above, I got ∆H= (4x799)-((2x1072)+495). I'm well aware of how to draw Lewis structures, and am positive I got all the bond enthalpies right and ∆H came out to be 557kJ, which is much closer to the 510kJ given in the problem description.

Where I am stuck is getting ∆H through the graph. Supposedly ∆H=Slope x R(constant)... but with such a small different in 1/T's or the ∆x value or the denominator in the rise/run slope formula, the slope always comes out enormous. How am I supposed to get ∆H for the first method? I looked over the numbers many times and they all seem correct.

Any help please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have a feeling you’re plotting your data in joules and comparing it to an answer in kilojoules. Just a hunch.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top