Chemical Potential for Bosonic Particles

YAHA
Messages
121
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I am working Problem 5.29 *** (b) in Griffiths QM. We are asked to show that m(T) monotonically increases as T decreases, assuming N and V are constants. m(T) - is chemical potential.



Homework Equations



Too many to list, probably easier to look in the book if you have it.

The Attempt at a Solution



Honestly, I played with this for 2 hours. I also have the solutions manual. Even after looking there, the logic is completely incomprehensible. Specifically, he concludes that as T->0, E->0 and thus, m(T) must be negative. This step is not evident at all (as are many others in Griffiths books and solutions manuals).



 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would really appreciate some help. The solution goes something like this: m(T) = (2/V)[NkTln(2)+(2π2/3)N2/2V2/3T2/3] Differentiating with respect to T: dm/dT = -(2/VT)[N(2π2/3)N2V-2/3T-1/2]Using the fact that dE/dT > 0 we get: dm/dT > 0 This means that m(T) is an increasing function of T As T--> 0, E --> 0 and thus m(T) must be negative.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top