Chemistry: Algebra Combining Equations [Enthelpy]

  • Thread starter Thread starter intellekt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algebra Chemistry
AI Thread Summary
To solve the lab analysis question, the discussion emphasizes the application of Hess's Law to combine the given equations and their enthalpy values. The user seeks clarification on whether to change the signs of the enthalpy values before adding them to derive the enthalpy of combustion for magnesium. It is confirmed that the signs should be altered as necessary based on the direction of the reactions. The final step involves plugging in the values after the equations are combined. Understanding these steps is crucial for accurately calculating the enthalpy change.
intellekt
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi, I am stuck on this one question for a lab analysis I am doing. I missed the class where the teacher explained this and a lot more stuff. I also recall a question like this on a test I wrote on friday:smile:

Anyway here it is:

Algebraically combine equations (2), (3), and (4) and their corresponding [Change in Enthalpy] values, to get (1) and [Change in Enthalpy] of combustion of magnesium.

I just need to know how to do it, I can plug in the values after right?

Let me know! thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you learned about Hess's Law?
"[URL
Your question requires a direct application of Hess's Law.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ya I have learned Hess' law but I'm still unsure...

So do I change the signs then add them together to get the enthalpy of equation 1?
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top