Chemistry - Ideal gas equation question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the new pressure of oxygen in a steel gas bottle after releasing 700g of gas. The ideal gas equation, PV = nRT, is applied, noting that volume and temperature remain constant. Participants clarify that the pressure can be determined using the ratio of initial and final moles of gas. The final calculation yields a new pressure of approximately 5482 Pa after the gas release. This demonstrates the application of the ideal gas law in practical scenarios.
david18
Messages
49
Reaction score
0
A steel gas bottle contains 4500g of oxygen. The pressure of the gas inside the bottle is 6492Pa. If 700g of gas are slowly released from the bottle, what will be the new pressure of the remaining gas? (Assume that the temperature stays constant when the oxygen is released)

I'm having trouble with this question as I can only find PV but not P on its own.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Use PV = nRT before and after the release.
You know the change in 'n' the number of moles, and V stays the same, volume of bottle doesn't change.
 
Would you take the Pa/mol and multiply that by the final mol. I get 5429 Pa. I am learning this subject as well, so I am curious.
 
PV = nRT
V is constant, T is constant, R is constant (obviously!) so all you need is P/n before and after. YOu can work in totally arbitrary units for n since we are cancelling thme out

P1/n1 = P2/n2
P2 = P1 n2/n1 = 6492 * (4500-700)/4500 = 5482 Pa
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top