Chemistry Ionic Bonds. Which is the strongest?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining which compound has the strongest ionic bond among Cs2Se, AlN, CaI2, and KBr. Initially, the focus was on electronegativity differences, with KBr showing the largest difference at 1.9. However, it was clarified that ionic bond strength is more accurately assessed by considering the charges of the ions rather than just electronegativity differences. Ultimately, AlN is identified as having the strongest ionic bond due to its ionic charges. Understanding the role of ionic charges is crucial for evaluating ionic bond strength.
name_ask17
Messages
146
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Which has the strongest ionic bond?
Cs2Se
AlN
CaI2
Kbr

Homework Equations



Look at electronegativities

The Attempt at a Solution



I looked at electronegativities and found the differences.
The largest difference was KBr. But apparently, that was wrong. See EN differences below.

Cs2Se: 1.6
AlN: 1.5
CaI2: 1.5
KBr: 1.9

Ionic bond strength increases with increasing change in EN, correct?
What am I doing wrong?
Please advise if you can.
Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Oh wait. I figured it out. You look at charges, not the EN difference for this part. So, AlN would be the answer.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top