Cherenkov detector on a venus orbiter (Venera 9)

AI Thread Summary
The Venera 9 orbiter was equipped with a Cherenkov detector to identify high-energy particles, specifically protons and electrons, which could provide insights into cosmic radiation. While the detector does not directly measure Venus's atmospheric conditions, it contributes to understanding the planet's environment in relation to cosmic phenomena. The landers of Venera 9 and 10 operated successfully for about an hour before losing communication, likely due to the orbiter's angular speed differing from Venus' rotational speed. The missions are speculated to have been motivated by a desire to explore new physics, potentially for military applications. Overall, the Venera missions combined scientific exploration with strategic interests.
hangainlover
Messages
77
Reaction score
0
questions about the Soviet's Venus missions

I was reading about the Soviet Union's Venus missions and they equipped Venera 9 orbiter with cherenkov detector.
So it detects particles traveling faster than the speed of light in a given medium
What was this Cherenkov detector used for? It doesn't help them measure specifics of Venus as far as i can tell (temperature, atmospheric composition, pressure etc)

Also, for Venera 9 and 10, it says the landers were functioning fine. Yet they only were able to take data and have experiments on the surface of Venus for about an hour because the orbiter went out of radio range.
Did the orbiter go out of range because of the difference between Venus' rotatational angular speed and the orbiter's angular speed?
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Frankly, I think these missions were driven by a desire to discover new physics with potential military applications. It all makes sense in that context.
 
Venera 9’s Cherenkov detector was used to detect and count protons of Ep>500 MeV and electrons of Ee>7 MeV arriving from all directions.

http://nssdcftp.gsfc.nasa.gov/ spacecraft _data/russian_msu/venera-10/va_descr.txt
 
Last edited by a moderator:
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top