SergejVictorov
- 22
- 0
Hey folks, I'm trying to understand a couple of calculations in Chern-Simons theory and I'm stuck.
I want to prove the following in four spacetime dimensions:
Let G be a Lie Group with generators T_{a}. Further let
A=T_{a} A^{a}_{\mu} dx^{\mu}
be a connection and
F=dA+A \wedge A
its field strength. Now I want to prove
Tr F \wedge F= d Tr(A \wedge dA+\frac{2}{3}A\wedge A\wedge A)
First I tried the following
F\wedge F=dA\wedge dA+dA \wedge A\wedge A+A\wedge A\wedge dA+A\wedge A\wedge A\wedge A
d (A \wedge dA+\frac{2}{3}A\wedge A\wedge A)= dA\wedge dA+\frac{2}{3}dA\wedge A\wedge A +\frac{2}{3} A\wedge dA\wedge A+\frac{2}{3} A\wedge A \wedge dA
When I take the trace, I can make a A\wedge A\wedge dA into dA \wedge A\wedge A, but that leaves the questions of why the trace of A^4 has to vanish and where the factors of 2/3 come from.
Alternatively, I tried the following:
Let A_t=tA and
F_t=dA_t+A_t\wedge A_t=dt\wedgeA+t dA+t^2 A\wedge A
Now one can evaluate Tr F_t \wedge F_t and afterwards set t=1. This works out fine, but I still don't understand why the trace of A^4 has to vanish.
So for the moment, it all boils down to: why is Tr A^4=0?
Thank you for your help!
I want to prove the following in four spacetime dimensions:
Let G be a Lie Group with generators T_{a}. Further let
A=T_{a} A^{a}_{\mu} dx^{\mu}
be a connection and
F=dA+A \wedge A
its field strength. Now I want to prove
Tr F \wedge F= d Tr(A \wedge dA+\frac{2}{3}A\wedge A\wedge A)
First I tried the following
F\wedge F=dA\wedge dA+dA \wedge A\wedge A+A\wedge A\wedge dA+A\wedge A\wedge A\wedge A
d (A \wedge dA+\frac{2}{3}A\wedge A\wedge A)= dA\wedge dA+\frac{2}{3}dA\wedge A\wedge A +\frac{2}{3} A\wedge dA\wedge A+\frac{2}{3} A\wedge A \wedge dA
When I take the trace, I can make a A\wedge A\wedge dA into dA \wedge A\wedge A, but that leaves the questions of why the trace of A^4 has to vanish and where the factors of 2/3 come from.
Alternatively, I tried the following:
Let A_t=tA and
F_t=dA_t+A_t\wedge A_t=dt\wedgeA+t dA+t^2 A\wedge A
Now one can evaluate Tr F_t \wedge F_t and afterwards set t=1. This works out fine, but I still don't understand why the trace of A^4 has to vanish.
So for the moment, it all boils down to: why is Tr A^4=0?
Thank you for your help!