Chern Simons form: calculation

  • Thread starter Thread starter SergejVictorov
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculation Form
SergejVictorov
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Hey folks, I'm trying to understand a couple of calculations in Chern-Simons theory and I'm stuck.

I want to prove the following in four spacetime dimensions:

Let G be a Lie Group with generators T_{a}. Further let
A=T_{a} A^{a}_{\mu} dx^{\mu}
be a connection and
F=dA+A \wedge A
its field strength. Now I want to prove
Tr F \wedge F= d Tr(A \wedge dA+\frac{2}{3}A\wedge A\wedge A)

First I tried the following
F\wedge F=dA\wedge dA+dA \wedge A\wedge A+A\wedge A\wedge dA+A\wedge A\wedge A\wedge A

d (A \wedge dA+\frac{2}{3}A\wedge A\wedge A)= dA\wedge dA+\frac{2}{3}dA\wedge A\wedge A +\frac{2}{3} A\wedge dA\wedge A+\frac{2}{3} A\wedge A \wedge dA

When I take the trace, I can make a A\wedge A\wedge dA into dA \wedge A\wedge A, but that leaves the questions of why the trace of A^4 has to vanish and where the factors of 2/3 come from.

Alternatively, I tried the following:

Let A_t=tA and
F_t=dA_t+A_t\wedge A_t=dt\wedgeA+t dA+t^2 A\wedge A

Now one can evaluate Tr F_t \wedge F_t and afterwards set t=1. This works out fine, but I still don't understand why the trace of A^4 has to vanish.

So for the moment, it all boils down to: why is Tr A^4=0?

Thank you for your help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
SergejVictorov said:
d (A \wedge dA+\frac{2}{3}A\wedge A\wedge A)= dA\wedge dA+\frac{2}{3}dA\wedge A\wedge A +\frac{2}{3} A\wedge dA\wedge A+\frac{2}{3} A\wedge A \wedge dA

The sign of the third term on the right hand side should be minus, due to antisymmetry of the exterior derivative. We also have
Tr\left[dA\wedge A\wedge A \right]= \epsilon^{ijkl}Tr\left[(\partial_{i}A_{j})A_{k}A_{l} \right]= \epsilon^{ijkl}Tr\left[A_{l}(\partial_{i}A_{j})A_{k} \right] = -\epsilon^{ijkl}Tr\left[A_{i}(\partial_{j}A_{k})A_{l} \right]=-Tr\left[A\wedge dA\wedge A \right],
in which the cyclic property of trace and the antisymmetry of the \displaystyle{\epsilon} tensor is used.

Tr\left[A^{4}\right]=0 can be proved similarly.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top