Chi-square distribution Verification

  • Thread starter Thread starter Askhwhelp
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Distribution
Askhwhelp
Messages
84
Reaction score
0
By Definition, Let ν be a positive integer. A random variable Y is said to have a chi-square
distribution with ν degrees of freedom if and only if Y is a gamma-distributed random variable with parameters α = ν/2 and β = 2.
By Thm, If Y is a chi-square random variable with ν degrees of freedom, then
μ = E(Y) = ν and σ^2 = V(Y) = 2ν.

(1) Whether E(Y) = 10, E[(1+Y)^2] = 36 have a chi-square distribution?
E(Y^2) = V(Y)+[E(Y)]^2 = 2*10 + 10^2 = 120
E(Y) = 10, E[(1+Y)^2] = E[1+2Y+Y^2] = E(1) + 2E(Y) + E(Y^2) = 1 + 2*10 + 120 = 141
Therefore, this is a not chi-square distribution.

(2) Whether E(Y) = 10, E[(1+Y)^2] = 51 have a chi-square distribution?
E(Y^2) = V(Y)+[E(Y)]^2 = 2*10 + 10^2 = 120
E(Y) = 10, E[(1+Y)^2] = E[1+2Y+Y^2] = E(1) + 2E(Y) + E(Y^2) = 1 + 2*10 + 120 = 141
Therefore, this is a not chi-square distribution.

Am my reasoning right? If not, what is the right approach? If so, is there any other ways to show this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please take a look
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top