Choice of computing platform for guidance system

AI Thread Summary
When selecting a computing platform for a guidance system focused on attitude estimation and control of a flying vehicle, key considerations include processing power, community support, and wireless programming capabilities. Options like Gumstix offer significant processing power, while Raspberry Pi is favored for its extensive hardware options, open-source software, and active community. Real-time operation is crucial for effective control algorithms, and there are concerns about achieving this alongside wireless functionality. TI DSPs and Code Composer Studio are noted for their capabilities but lack wireless operation. Ultimately, the choice of platform should balance performance with the ability to support mobile, wireless applications.
eichfeld
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I am just starting to learn about attitude estimation and control of a flying(or actually, a freefalling) vehicle. There will be inputs from accelerometers and gyroscopes, Kalman filtering to estimate the correct attitude and control algorithm to achieve the desired attitude.

I am still putting down the first things to paper, but I also need to think what computing platform will I be using when I start realizing the thing. The platform should obviously be powerful enough for all the number-crunching, it should have a community I can ask help from and since the vehicle will be highly mobile(flying!), I would prefer having wireless programming/debugging capabilities.

What would be your recommendations for this kind of platform?

Gumstix seems to be powerful. Is it possible to have a system what is real-time and also have wireless capabilities?

I like TI DSP's and Code Composer Studio and have access to Dev Kits and licensed CCS, but these things are not meant to operate wirelessly.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I would use Raspberry Pi. Lots of hardware, open source software, and a community.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top