Choose the signs of vectors as to maximize modulus of their sum.

sodemus
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I have a fairly simple problem which but I'm not sure if it should rather be in a computer science forum for algorithms or something.

Given n vectors, how do you choose the sign of each vector as to maximize the modulus of the sum of the vectors?

Sure you could go through all 2^n combinations, but that's not necessarily the most efficient way (really, you only need to go through 2^(n-1) since the second half is just negative the first half, but still). I can't figure out what all the dependencies are.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm assuming that by "sign of each vector" you mean if you should add or subtract that vector from the accumulated/summed vector, and that by modulus you mean the length.

My immediate thought was that you don't want to go "backwards". So if the inner product between the summed vector and the next vector is negative, subtract the vector, otherwise add it.

Of course, this might be just silly.
 
Thanks for your reply and yes, you got the problem right!

Well, that was my first thought as well but I didn't think it actually leads to global maximum/minimum since that assumes knowledge of how the 2 first vectors would contribute to the final sum. Well, perhaps, since the sign of the resulting vector actually is arbitrary. But I think the final sum is only non-unique to one sign (two combinations) and the sum of the first two vectors are non-unique to two signs (4 combinations)...

Any thoughts are greatly appreciated!
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top