Christoffel symbol manipulation

redstone
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If the basic equation for the Christoffel symbol is
<br /> \Gamma^l_{ki} = \frac{1}{2} g^{lj} (\partial_k g_{ij} + \partial_i g_{jk} - \partial_j g_{ki})<br />
so if you bring multiply the first metric into that equation, won't that turn the first two derivatives into derivatives of a mixed metric
<br /> \Gamma^l_{ki} = \frac{1}{2} (\partial_k g^{l}_{i} + \partial_i g^{l}_{k} - g^{lj} \partial_j g_{ki})<br />
and then, wouldn't the first two terms go to zero, since they're just the derivative of the kronecker delta, which is constant? If that's correct, why not express the symbol instead as
<br /> \Gamma^l_{ki} = \frac{1}{2} ( - g^{lj} \partial_j g_{ki})<br />
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Because g^{lj}*partial_k(g_{ij}) is not generally equal to partial_k(g^{lj}*g_{ij})=0. The metric components are not generally constants. Use the product rule on the second expression.
 
oh, jeez, of course. I feel silly now.
Thanks!
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top