Chromatography: The difference in kinetic energy

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion about chromatography, specifically paper chromatography, the focus is on the kinetic energy of the solvent. It is noted that the upper portion of the moving solvent has more kinetic energy compared to the lower portion, which is perceived to have stopped due to obstacles from absorbed water molecules. Participants seek clarification on the terminology used, particularly regarding the definitions of "upper portion" and "lower portion" within the context of the solvent's movement on the paper strip. The conversation emphasizes the need for precise language to fully understand the dynamics of solvent movement in chromatography.
Elsa1234
Messages
47
Reaction score
2
In chromatography, the upper portion of the moving water solvent has more kinetic energy, than the lower portion of the moving water solvent because the lower portion of water molecules have to face more obstacles in the way because of the absorbed water molecules. Is it true?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
This question is hard to understand. What kind of chromatography are you referring to? And what do you mean by "upper portion" and "lower portion"?
 
DrClaude said:
This question is hard to understand. What kind of chromatography are you referring to? And what do you mean by "upper portion" and "lower portion"?
I'm referring to paper chromatography. And by upper portion, I mean the upper area where the solvent column on the paper strip is moving forward, and by lower portion I mean the lower area on the paper strip where the solvent column appears to have stopped.
 
I want to test a humidity sensor with one or more saturated salt solutions. The table salt that I have on hand contains one of two anticaking agents, calcium silicate or sodium aluminosilicate. Will the presence of either of these additives (or iodine for that matter) significantly affect the equilibrium humidity? I searched and all the how-to-do-it guides did not address this question. One research paper I found reported that at 1.5% w/w calcium silicate increased the deliquescent point by...
Back
Top