Circle to cylindrical coordinates

sci-doo
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Transform to cylindrical coordinates:
x^{2}+y^{2}=R^{2}

Doesn't look like a problem at all first... :smile:

Homework Equations


.. after all I know that is a circle (2d) and we can forget the z-axis (=0) and transform it to just polar coords.
Also I know, that for polar coordinates
x = r cos\theta
y = r sin\theta

The Attempt at a Solution


But I don't know how to put it out as an answer. Am I supposed to give a parametric equation in terms of x=... and y=... or should it be like r=... and \theta=... and z=0 or can I express it without parametres? :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org

hey, do I get the correct equation just by replacing x with r cos\theta and y with r sin\theta? So that cartesian eq
x^{2}+y^{2}=R^{2}
is
(r cos\theta)^{2}+(r sin\theta)^{2}=R^{2}
in cylindrical?

Or should it be something else, like parametric form of some kind?
 
:bugeye:
(r cos\theta)^{2}+(r sin\theta)^{2}=R^{2}
and it all goes down to r=R?

I guess it goes the same way with the spherical coordinates.

I'm sorry for this monoloque. :blushing:

I hope someone would correct me if I'm wrong. thank you.
 
Yes, x^2+ y^2= R^2 is a cylinder (not a circle) of radius R so it is particulary simple in cylindrical coordinates.

No, it does not "go that way" with spherical coordinates. In spherical coordinates x= \rho cos(\theta) sin(\phi) and \phi= \rho sin(\theta) sin(\phi) so x^2+ y^2= \rho^2 cos^2(\theta)sin^2(\phi)+ \rho^2 sin^2(\theta)sin^2(\phi)= <br /> \rho^2 sin^2(\phi)= R^2.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
HallsofIvy said:
Yes, x^2+ y^2= R^2 is a cylinder (not a circle) of radius R so it is particulary simple in cylindrical coordinates.

I think (and still do) that it is a circle, because it has no z. :eek:

HallsofIvy said:
No, it does not "go that way" with spherical coordinates. In spherical coordinates x= \rho cos(\theta) sin(\phi) and \phi= \rho sin(\theta) sin(\phi) so x^2+ y^2= \rho^2 cos^2(\theta)sin^2(\phi)+ rho^2 sin^2(\theta)sin^2(\phi)= <br /> \rho^2 sin^2(\phi)= R^2.

Isn't the equation for circle R=r in both cylindrical and spherical coordinates?
 
sci-doo said:
I think (and still do) that it is a circle, because it has no z. :eek:



Isn't the equation for circle R=r in both cylindrical and spherical coordinates?

It is a cylinder, as a matter of fact. Because, it is saying that for any z at all, we have x^2+y^2=R^2.:-p
 
sutupidmath said:
It is a cylinder, as a matter of fact. Because, it is saying that for any z at all, we have x^2+y^2=R^2.:-p

CylindricalCoordinates_1001.gif


If the z is zero, aren't we only left with a circle?

man.. understanding one thing requires not understanding two..

I hope I know how to turn cartesian equations to cylindrical and spherical now.

I'm really trusting on these tricks:

For cylindrical: x^2+y^2=r^2
For spherical: x^2+y^2+z^2=\rho^2

So if I must for example turn this cartesian
x^2+y^2-z=0
into a speherical equation, i just add both sides z^2 and
x^2+y^2+z^2=z+z^2
\rho^2=z+z^2
\rho=\sqrt{z+z^2} and because z= \rho cos \phi
\rho=\sqrt{\rho cos \phi +(\rho cos \phi)^2}

Most likely I'm wrong. Once again, help is really appreciated. :frown:
 

Attachments

  • CylindricalCoordinates_1001.gif
    CylindricalCoordinates_1001.gif
    4 KB · Views: 466
sci-doo said:
CylindricalCoordinates_1001.gif


If the z is zero, aren't we only left with a circle?

man.. understanding one thing requires not understanding two..

I hope I know how to turn cartesian equations to cylindrical and spherical now.

I'm really trusting on these tricks:

For cylindrical: x^2+y^2=r^2
For spherical: x^2+y^2+z^2=\rho^2

So if I must for example turn this cartesian
x^2+y^2-z=0
into a speherical equation, i just add both sides z^2 and
x^2+y^2+z^2=z+z^2
\rho^2=z+z^2
\rho=\sqrt{z+z^2} and because z= \rho cos \phi
\rho=\sqrt{\rho cos \phi +(\rho cos \phi)^2}

Most likely I'm wrong. Once again, help is really appreciated. :frown:


That is one way of doing it. You could have also just substitute the values of x,y and z in terms of ro, cos, sin and corresponding angles, and you would have ended up with the same thing.

Note: the reason you can take the square root of \rho^2 is because it cannot be negative. Otherwise, you would have stepped on the red line...:biggrin:
 
sci-doo said:
CylindricalCoordinates_1001.gif


If the z is zero, aren't we only left with a circle?

Well, as a matter of fact, the levle curves of this surface projected in any plane z=k, where k is a constant, are circles.
 
  • #10
sci-doo said:
CylindricalCoordinates_1001.gif


If the z is zero, aren't we only left with a circle?
Yes, but you are NOT told that z= 0. Because "it has no z", there is no restriction on z: z can be any number.

man.. understanding one thing requires not understanding two.. [\quote]
No, understanding one thing requires understanding two!

I hope I know how to turn cartesian equations to cylindrical and spherical now.

I'm really trusting on these tricks:

For cylindrical: x^2+y^2=r^2
For spherical: x^2+y^2+z^2=\rho^2

So if I must for example turn this cartesian
x^2+y^2-z=0
into a speherical equation, i just add both sides z^2 and
x^2+y^2+z^2=z+z^2
\rho^2=z+z^2
\rho=\sqrt{z+z^2} and because z= \rho cos \phi
\rho=\sqrt{\rho cos \phi +(\rho cos \phi)^2}
It would be better to leave it as
\rho^2=\rho cos \phi +(\rho cos \phi)^2


Most likely I'm wrong. Once again, help is really appreciated. :frown:
 
Back
Top