Circuit question: Why are these R in series and not in parallel?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the distinction between resistors in series and parallel based on current flow and potential difference. Resistors R1 and R2 are in series because current must pass through one to reach the other, while R4 and R5 are in parallel since current can flow through either without restriction. The solution involves combining equivalent resistances step-by-step, leading to a final equivalent resistance that includes R3 in series with the combination of R12 and R34. The key takeaway is to focus on the current's path rather than the visual layout of the circuit. Understanding these principles is essential for analyzing complex resistor configurations effectively.
Parad0x88
Messages
73
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Ok so I don't actually need help to solve the problem and find the currents and voltages for each resistors, that is done and quite easy for me. What I don't understand for this specific problem is why everything in the solution is inverse. For example:

R1 and R2, my reflex would be to say they are in parallel, but in this problem they are in series
R3, R4 and R5, my reflex would be to say they are in parallel, but in this problem, R4 and R5 and in parallel with the new combo R12, and finally R3 is in series with the combo R1234

I am assuming it is due to the fact of where A and B is positioned in the drawing, but I cannot explain it. Any help would be greatly appreciated!
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    5.7 KB · Views: 461
Physics news on Phys.org
Resistors are in series if the current which passes through one also passes through each of the others.

Resistors are in parallel if the potential difference which is across one of them is also the same potential difference which is across each of the others.
 
The key is to take it in steps and pay attention to what the current has to do, it doesn't matter what it looks like. If the current has to pass through one before it can get to the other, it's in series.

Step 1: You can immediately conclude that r4 and r5 are in parallel because current is not forced to go through one before it can get to the other. Make this an equivalent resistance R45p.

Step 2: Once you have done this, it is clear that r1 and r2 must be in series because current must pass through one in order to get to the other. Make this resistance R12s.

Step 3: You now can combine these two equivalent resistances. It is clear they are in parallel because current can flow through R12s or R34p without passing through the other. (If it is hard to visualize, draw each step. I just erase part of the circuit and redraw the eq resistance.)

Step 4: Finally, you are down to two resistors, R3 and ((R12s)(R34p))p. These are clearly in series because current must pass through one to get to the other.

The final singular equivalent resistances is then:

(((R12s)(R34p))p)R3)s

I'm not sure that notation is very clear, I hope this helps.
 
1MileCrash said:
The key is to take it in steps and pay attention to what the current has to do, it doesn't matter what it looks like. If the current has to pass through one before it can get to the other, it's in series.

Step 1: You can immediately conclude that r4 and r5 are in parallel because current is not forced to go through one before it can get to the other. Make this an equivalent resistance R45p.

Step 2: Once you have done this, it is clear that r1 and r2 must be in series because current must pass through one in order to get to the other. Make this resistance R12s.

Step 3: You now can combine these two equivalent resistances. It is clear they are in parallel because current can flow through R12s or R34p without passing through the other. (If it is hard to visualize, draw each step. I just erase part of the circuit and redraw the eq resistance.)

Step 4: Finally, you are down to two resistors, R3 and ((R12s)(R34p))p. These are clearly in series because current must pass through one to get to the other.

The final singular equivalent resistances is then:

(((R12s)(R34p))p)R3)s

I'm not sure that notation is very clear, I hope this helps.

Awesome, thanks! I hadn't learned it this way, but it makes perfect sense!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
667
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Back
Top