Circular Angular Acceleration problem

AI Thread Summary
The problem involves calculating the acceleration of a stone stuck in the tread of a tire spinning at a constant speed of 60.0 mi/h. The tire's diameter is 2.00 feet, leading to a radius of 0.305 meters. The initial calculations for angular velocity (ω) and tangential acceleration (a_t) were incorrect, as the correct approach involves using centripetal acceleration. The proper formula for centripetal acceleration is a_c = v^2/r, where v is the linear speed converted to meters per second. Ultimately, the correct centripetal acceleration is approximately 2350 m/s².
the7joker7
Messages
111
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A tire 2.00 feet in diameter is placed on a balancing machine, where it is spun so that its tread is moving at a constant speed of 60.0 mi/h. A small stone is stuck in the tread of the tire. What is the acceleration of the stone as the tire is being balanced?

Homework Equations



\omega = \frac{change in theta}{change in time}

r = diameter/2

\alpha = \frac{\omega - \omega_{0}} {time}

a_{t} = r*\alpha

The Attempt at a Solution



\omega = 840.3 rev/min = 88 radians/sec.

radius = .305m.

\alpha = \frac{88 radians}{1 second} = 88 radians/second^{2}.

a_{t} = .305 *88 = 26.84 m/s^{2}
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You got omega (I'll call it w) just fine somehow. I'm not sure how because it's not clear what you did. But acceleration isn't w*r, that's velocity v. 26.8m/sec=60mi/hr. You are back where you started. Acceleration is v^2/r=(w*r)^2/r=w^2*r.
 
Well, going from 60mi/hr to radians/second is pretty basic math as long as you know the transformation values.

Thanks for the help!

EDIT: I got 88^{2} * .305 = 2631.92radians/seconds^{2}. Look right?
 
Last edited:
Use the equation centripetal acceleration = v^2/r. The radius s 1.00 ft, or .305 m. V is 60 mi/h, or 26.8 m/s. Then the acceleration would be (26.8)^2/0.305, which is 2350 m/s^2
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top