Circular motion (2 particles on a string)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the tension in two sections of a string connected to two particles in circular motion. The tension in section AP is calculated to be 1.08N, derived from the forces acting on both particles. The calculations involve resolving the forces acting on particle B and particle P separately, leading to the conclusion that T1 equals the sum of the tensions and forces acting on both particles. Additionally, it is confirmed that for vertically hanging particles, the tension in the upper string equals the sum of their weights. The thread emphasizes the importance of free body diagrams for clarity in solving such problems.
Geometor
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A light inextensible string of length 0.6m has one end fixed to a point A on a smooth horizontal plane. The other end of the string is attactched to a particle B, of mass 0.4kg. A particle P of mass 0.1kg is attatched to the mid-point of the string. The line APB is straight and rotation continues at 2 rad s^-1 on the surface of the plane.

1) Calculate the tension in the section of the string AP.
2) Calculate the tension in the section of the string BP.

Homework Equations



Centripetal force = mass x radius x (angular velocity)^2

The Attempt at a Solution



I imagined that the tension in AP would simply be:
0.1 x 0.3 x 2^2 = 0.12N

however the answer is given as 1.08N. So my question really is how does two particles on the same string affect the tension?

I placed in q.2 for curiosity.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You must draw free body diagrams . You should first start with question 2 to determine the string tension BP by looking at particle B alone. Then look at particle P alone. There are 2 tension forces acting on particle P.
 
Excuse the poor diagram but:

A--->---<---P--->---<---B

where > and < indicates direction of the force
from left to right forces are: T1, T1, T2, T2

Considering B alone, resolving horizontally:
T(at B) = 0.4 x 0.6 x 2^2 = 0.96N

Considering P alone, resolving horizontally:
T(at P) = 0.1 x 0.3 x 2^2 = 0.12N

So I suppose this says that the resultant force on P is 0.12N.
So if we take left as positive at P,

T1 - T2 = 0.12N
T1 = 0.12 + 0.96
= 1.08N

I believe this is the correct line of thinking?

Also, if 2 particles hang on a string (light, inextensible) vertically, one above another. Will the tension in the top string be the sum of the weight of the two particles?

Thank you.
 
Geometor said:
Excuse the poor diagram but:

A--->---<---P--->---<---B

where > and < indicates direction of the force
from left to right forces are: T1, T1, T2, T2

Considering B alone, resolving horizontally:
T(at B) = 0.4 x 0.6 x 2^2 = 0.96N
The net (resultant) horizontal force at B is 0.96N; since the only horizontal force acting at B is T1, then T1 = 0.96N
Considering P alone, resolving horizontally:
T(at P) = 0.1 x 0.3 x 2^2 = 0.12N
again, this is the resultant horizonatal force at P
So I suppose this says that the resultant force on P is 0.12N.
yes
So if we take left as positive at P,

T1 - T2 = 0.12N
T1 = 0.12 + 0.96
= 1.08N

I believe this is the correct line of thinking?
yes
Also, if 2 particles hang on a string (light, inextensible) vertically, one above another. Will the tension in the top string be the sum of the weight of the two particles?
yes
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top