Circular Motion of space station

AI Thread Summary
To achieve an artificial gravity acceleration of 8.0 m/s² in a circular space station with a diameter of 500 m, the required revolutions per minute (RPM) must be calculated using the formula for centripetal acceleration. For simulating Martian gravity at 3.70 m/s², a different RPM will be necessary. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding uniform circular motion and centripetal acceleration to solve these problems. Participants are encouraged to apply the relevant equations and share their progress. The focus is on utilizing physics concepts to determine the necessary RPM for both scenarios.
sk257
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



4) A circular space station rotates to provide an “artificial gravity” at the outside rim.
a) If the diameter of the space station is 500m, how many revolutions per minute are needed in order for the “artificial gravity” acceleration to be 8.0 ms-2?
b) If the space station is a waiting area for travellers to Mars, it might be desirable to simulate the acceleration due to gravity of the Martian surface (3.70 ms-2). How many revolutions per minute are needed in this case?



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Don't know where to start:(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Look up centripetal acceleration.
 
As a body moves in a circle at a constant speed, it is said to be in uniform circular motion. You can apply this concept to the space station scenario with the formula for centripetal acceleration in regards to uniform circular motion which is as follows:[PLAIN]http://www4d.wolframalpha.com/Calculate/MSP/MSP58019ch44b53a75489i000064hd048a5c41b9hb?MSPStoreType=image/gif&s=32&w=211&h=147

Give it a shot and let us know how you're doing.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

What is the Height of the International Space Station Above the Earth's Surface?
Replies
2
Views
3K
How Long Should Rockets Fire to Rotate a Space Station?
Replies
4
Views
2K
Creating Artificial Gravity in Space: Using Centripetal Force on a Space Station
Replies
4
Views
2K
Centripetal Acceleration/Gravity Problem
Replies
1
Views
2K
Calculate rpm with circular motion
Replies
3
Views
9K
What Is the Fake Gravity on a Circular Space Hotel Orbiting Earth?
Replies
1
Views
1K
Centripetal Force / circular motion question
Replies
7
Views
3K
What is the force behind artificial gravity in rotating space stations?
Replies
1
Views
2K
Calculating Centripetal Acceleration for a Spinning Fairgrounds Ride
Replies
2
Views
1K
Centripetal Acceleration must equal Gravity in a Space Station
Replies
4
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top